Well, I disagree with you on the junk part. A new Seiko 5 may last a while, but these have lasted decades probably without maintenance and still run fine (in half the cases) with a sleeker, more thought out design, without the rattling sound and tons of space for the tolerances (between hands, in the mechanism, etc.) and things like folded sheet metal bracelets or soft scratch prone metal (the HMT casing, although not the screw lid, is made of a hard steel that is quite scratch resistant). Certainly the finish is neater than many Rodinas I've seen, and the movement fully jewelled. This is not just my opinion but that you can find on various watch forums.
I also personally (functionally) prefer a curved acrylic crystal to a straight mineral crystal in a case with higher walls, because it does not catch as easily on shirt cuffs, although I understand on this point if you think differently, as it is a matter of taste.
Finally, I suspect the broken ones are so because of bad (or no) maintenance and HMT's reputation for crap QC rather than inherent quality issues in the design itself (i.e. the good ones are good). In particular it is easy to ruin the mechanism around the stem by not depressing the "I'm taking the stem out" button next to it with a pin when you take it out before taking the movement out, and to bend the stem by misaligning it with the case hole when you replace the movement.
Today's (very sunny):
A few days ago:
Sorry, but I just struggle to see any rational justification for buying something that is demonstrable junk, regardless of price, aesthetics or features. Junk is junk. It doesn't become more appealing because you can buy quite a lot of junk for not a lot of money. That's how I see it. Others, of course, may see it differently.
Well, I disagree with you on the junk part. A new Seiko 5 may last a while, but these have lasted decades probably without maintenance and still run fine (in half the cases) with a sleeker, more thought out design, without the rattling sound and tons of space for the tolerances (between hands, in the mechanism, etc.) and things like folded sheet metal bracelets or soft scratch prone metal (the HMT casing, although not the screw lid, is made of a hard steel that is quite scratch resistant). Certainly the finish is neater than many Rodinas I've seen, and the movement fully jewelled. This is not just my opinion but that you can find on various watch forums.
I also personally (functionally) prefer a curved acrylic crystal to a straight mineral crystal in a case with higher walls, because it does not catch as easily on shirt cuffs, although I understand on this point if you think differently, as it is a matter of taste.
Finally, I suspect the broken ones are so because of bad (or no) maintenance and HMT's reputation for crap QC rather than inherent quality issues in the design itself (i.e. the good ones are good). In particular it is easy to ruin the mechanism around the stem by not depressing the "I'm taking the stem out" button next to it with a pin when you take it out before taking the movement out, and to bend the stem by misaligning it with the case hole when you replace the movement.
Today's (very sunny):
A few days ago: