- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 38,393
- Reaction score
- 13,643
Those are totally serviceable.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
What, because I didn't post for two days?
I wouldn't even consider those in bad condition yet alone tired.Hi guys, I am a first timer here.
I was wondering if any thrift shoppers have successfully revived tired full grain uppers, such as from a condition as depicted in the picture.
As it would be interesting to know the results of the attempts, and the process used.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/181729576568?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
Best wishes.
http://news.discovery.com/history/archaeology/oldest-shoe-moccasin.htm
Actually theres 5000 year old leather shoes for your survivorship bias
I would consider those very wearable, too. If you are asking if there is any way to get the toe creases to disappear, then no, there is not. You may be able to smooth them out a bit by conditioning, then putting in shoe trees, but I suspect the former owner used trees too, by the way the uppers taper toward the heel. Most non-shell shoes will have some toe creases after only a few wearings, and as long as the leather isn't cracking or splitting, it's okay. I'd be tempted by those myself, if they were my size and brown.I wouldn't even consider those in bad condition yet alone tired.
I've been using a shining method by shoe snob on YouTube. It involves cleaning, leather lotion/conditioner, pollish, then 4 subsequent water/pollish shinings. Is this a good method or are some saying that the conditioner/lotion is a waste of money/time?
I've been using a shining method by shoe snob on YouTube. It involves cleaning, leather lotion/conditioner, pollish, then 4 subsequent water/pollish shinings. Is this a good method or are some saying that the conditioner/lotion is a waste of money/time?
I don't think there is necessarily anything wrong with it. I wouldn't do the entire routine every time you care for your shoes. For example, "cleaning" with a brush can be done every time you wear them. As for the other steps, it completely depends how much you wear them and how you want them to look. But I would say generally speaking of the three, condition less often and wax more often and polish somewhere in between. As needed.
Justin's techniques are pretty good and I've spoken with him on occasion regards it, he certainly does know his stuff. I haven't seen the video in question but he generally infers that the full regime is only when you're stripping the wax back and starting fresh. If you already have the shine and the wax is still looking good then you only really need to keep shining, adding a little wax or conditioner now and again.I've been using a shining method by shoe snob on YouTube. It involves cleaning, leather lotion/conditioner, pollish, then 4 subsequent water/pollish shinings. Is this a good method or are some saying that the conditioner/lotion is a waste of money/time?
https://www.mountainroseherbs.com/products/sea-buckthorn-oil/profile - here is the oil's property. I'd certainly give a try on the cream, if I can get my hands into 'em.I have just been given a tub of Oliver Sweeney 'Brush Up' polish. It contains: beeswax, carnauba wax, lanolin, sea buckthorn oil and neatsfoot oil. I had never heard of sea buckthorn oil before and can't find any reference to it as a shoe product. Does this cream sound like a good thing to use on your shoes?