- Joined
- Apr 28, 2004
- Messages
- 18,360
- Reaction score
- 16
SAT score?
I am amused beyond words. Clearly you have a huge chip on your shoulder (and yes, I did go to an Ivy League university -- although my memory of my university days is rather fuzzy -- which probably puts you into an enormous rage, rambling on about "pompous elitist jerk" to borrow your earlier words -- although that was quite mild, compared to "screw your ****** attitude back into whatever socket you pulled it out of"). Well, I am sorry you didn't work hard enough to get into a good university (or any university). But that's no reason to go about spewing vulgary at anyone who disagrees with you, is it?
I personally have no chip on my shoulder about my or anyone elses schooling, and obviously I can stand toe to toe with the best on my own merit. I merely wished to refute your repeated attempts to belittle my intelligence, since you cannot provide any actual truthful content for this discussion. There are quite a few complete idiots who have graduated from Ivy League schools. I also believe that there are pompous elitist jerks who didn't attend college at all. Personally I don't distinguish between assholes regardless of their educational background. I only spew vulgarities at people who have earned them, and rest assured, your conduct in this thread has merited at least this much vulgarity.
Oh, you "choose not to respond"? How convenient is that? Blaming it on your poor time management is only an excuse. I believe you just cannot back up the presumptuous statements that you make. Which makes sense, since logically I have refuted all of them, and you have repeatedly tried to turn attention away from my refutations to make attacks on myself, the city in which I happen to live, and etc. instead of answering.While you wipe off your spittle of rage, let me simply point out one thing since I have no time to respond to your novel-length response:
I don't. I never said it was the best. I said that I liked it best out of all the places I've been so far, I said it was widely regarded as the best, and I said that it had the freshest fish and the most knowledgeable sushi chef of anywhere I've ever been. Hows that for some reading comprehension for you?If you haven't tried what many other people call the best sushi and sashimi restaurant in Seattle (Shiki), how do you know Shiro's is the best in Seattle?
I've been to probably 75% of the "better" sushi places in the Seattle/Eastside area and probably half a dozen or so in Tokyo, of which I'm not sure how prestigious or acclaimed they are, but they are family favorites. It just so happens that I've never gotten around to eating at Shiki. It doesn't help that its on Queen Anne, which is a neighborhood I'm seldom in. I think that the whole fugu thing may have biased me against eating there on the few occasions I've been in the neighborhood. So... my assertion that Shiro's is the best I've been to in Seattle encompasses probably 30 local sushi places. I feel that its a pretty good cross section of the establishments in the community. You may feel different, but frankly, I think I'm past the point of caring.Certainly it would be incovenient to try all Japanese restaurants, but surely you need to try all the major ones before you can pronounce which is best if only according to your own standards? (This is where what is known as LOGIC comes in handy).
Whereas there are several mediocre or negative reviews of Shiki elsewhere. Arguing reviews is pointless, as I tried to stress earlier. Shiki has exactly 9 reviews on Citysearch. Not exactly an overwhelmingly fair showing. I am not making excuses for mediocre to poor table service or perhaps sub par sous-chefs. I am saying that when you go into Shiro's, sit in front of Shiro, and put your mouth in his hands - the experience beats all others in Seattle that I have had to this point. His reputation, whether you choose to acknowledge it or not, stands.Look, I wish I had good food at Shiro's. I didn't. And no amount of "Well, food is only good at the bar-side" is going to placate me since I had good food at Shiki at table-side. And apparently enough patrons thought the same or worse to write about the place on Citysearch (whereas all reviews on Shiki were positive).
Lol... you are a nut dude. If you can invalidate 39 years of Seattle acclaimed head sushi chef experience by asserting that if one doesn't complete a 2 year Fugu apprenticeship in Japan they are unfit to cut your fish here in the US, I can certainly invalidate some reviews that have no bearing on my point in the conversation I am having with you. My assertion that Shiro's is the best I've been to in Seattle has nothing to do with sitting at a table and ordering what you are familiar and comfortable with. Therefore those reviews mean nothing to me, nor do they detract from my argument. This should have been very clear to you two pages ago.You may call them idiots, but the weight of evidence is against you. You cannot simply invalidate all of their reviews by fiat as if you were God.
I only write as much as is necessary, but thank you for the honor of the "last word".Anyway, since you enjoy writing novels on a forum, apparently, you can have the last words. This will be my last message on the subject. Go ahead and spew the venom.