• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Are Shoe Trees Important

fxh

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
5,153
Reaction score
1,716
Many problems with this experiment.

No blinding. Not even single blinding. Small number in sample. Is a pair of shoes N=1 or N=2?

The shoes may have had different levels of lanolin in each shoe this either increasing or decreasing the shoes ability to take up, absorb, water.

Did you weigh each shoe to determine if each shoe had taken up the same amount of water and had returned to the same weight afterwards in the same time? What was the Instrument used to measure time to dry?

Was the shoe tree weighed before and after to determine if it had actually taken up any, some or all of the water, alleged to be absorbed by the shoe leather?

The only conclusion that can be reasonably drawn from this less than optimal experiment is that shoe trees would appear to make no appreciable difference to measured sole/ toe curl in a single experiment comprised of dipping second hand shoes in water.

Certainly not acceptable in any refereed journal on mens clothing or footwear that I edit.
 

ryoneo

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
57

Many problems with this experiment.
No blinding. Not even single blinding. Small number in sample. Is a pair of shoes N=1 or N=2?
The shoes may have had different levels of lanolin in each shoe this either increasing or decreasing the shoes ability to take up, absorb, water.
Did you weigh each shoe to determine if each shoe had taken up the same amount of water and had returned to the same weight afterwards in the same time? What was the Instrument used to measure time to dry?
Was the shoe tree weighed before and after to determine if it had actually taken up any, some or all of the water, alleged to be absorbed by the shoe leather?
The only conclusion that can be reasonably drawn from this less than optimal experiment is that shoe trees would appear to make no appreciable difference to measured sole/ toe curl in a single experiment comprised of dipping second hand shoes in water.
Certainly not acceptable in any refereed journal on mens clothing or footwear that I edit.


:facepalm:
 

akatsuki

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
201
So according to a couple of high-end shoe makers here in NY - don't use them unless they are built to the correct last - their argument being that they will stretch your shoes out in funny ways in they aren't shaped correctly.

They suggested stuffing them with socks or something to preserve the shape but be somewhat shape conforming...
 

MyOtherLife

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
6,468
Reaction score
522

Just came across this thread. Any recommendations for decent cheap shoetrees?


There was once a member named Vox who gave the most absurd answer to this question. Though it was frightfully appaling to many it was also deliciously hilarious. I dare not repeat it.
 
Last edited:

Harold falcon

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
32,028
Reaction score
11,364

Many problems with this experiment.
No blinding. Not even single blinding. Small number in sample. Is a pair of shoes N=1 or N=2?
The shoes may have had different levels of lanolin in each shoe this either increasing or decreasing the shoes ability to take up, absorb, water.
Did you weigh each shoe to determine if each shoe had taken up the same amount of water and had returned to the same weight afterwards in the same time? What was the Instrument used to measure time to dry?
Was the shoe tree weighed before and after to determine if it had actually taken up any, some or all of the water, alleged to be absorbed by the shoe leather?
The only conclusion that can be reasonably drawn from this less than optimal experiment is that shoe trees would appear to make no appreciable difference to measured sole/ toe curl in a single experiment comprised of dipping second hand shoes in water.
Certainly not acceptable in any refereed journal on mens clothing or footwear that I edit.


I'll bet you get invited to all the New Year's Eve parties, right?
 

NORE

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
5,430
Reaction score
348

There was once a member named Vox who gave the most absurd answer to this question. Though it was frightfully appaling to many it was also deliciously hilarious. I dare not repeat it.


Senior member Ferdinand Corbera has duggen it up. I believe the term used was ""turducken" trees" which appears in this very thread.
 
Last edited:

atlrus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
93
Reaction score
3
So according to a couple of high-end shoe makers here in NY - don't use them unless they are built to the correct last - their argument being that they will stretch your shoes out in funny ways in they aren't shaped correctly.
They suggested stuffing them with socks or something to preserve the shape but be somewhat shape conforming...

I agree with this, it makes perfect sense.

I personally never had problems with too much moisture or the shoes "collapsing" from just sitting on the shoe rack (I have a cheap pair of Dockers bought 6-7 years ago and they still look just fine), but if I had to use anything I would simply stuff the shoes with newspaper. Much greater and faster moisture absorbance than a piece of wood and will add uniform pressure throughout the shoe.
 

NORE

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
5,430
Reaction score
348

I agree with this, it makes perfect sense.

I personally never had problems with too much moisture or the shoes "collapsing" from just sitting on the shoe rack (I have a cheap pair of Dockers bought 6-7 years ago and they still look just fine), but if I had to use anything I would simply stuff the shoes with newspaper. Much greater and faster moisture absorbance than a piece of wood and will add uniform pressure throughout the shoe.


WHY DO YOU HATE SHOE TREES SO MUCH?????
 

atlrus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
93
Reaction score
3
WHY DO YOU HATE SHOE TREES SO MUCH?????

lol, I don't really hate shoe trees. The day I start having strong feelings toward something like shoe trees would be the day I commit myself.

I just think they fail to deliver what some people claim:
1. Unless they are made from balsa wood, moisture absorption would be very minimal and slow.
2. Unless they were custom made to fit your shoe precisely - I don't see how they would help retain the original shape of the shoe. They should look like this:
 

Sanguis Mortuum

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
5,024
Reaction score
141

I personally never had problems with too much moisture or the shoes "collapsing" from just sitting on the shoe rack (I have a cheap pair of Dockers bought 6-7 years ago and they still look just fine)
You wear Dockers, therefore your opinion is null and void.
 

ryoneo

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
57

So according to a couple of high-end shoe makers here in NY - don't use them unless they are built to the correct last - their argument being that they will stretch your shoes out in funny ways in they aren't shaped correctly.
They suggested stuffing them with socks or something to preserve the shape but be somewhat shape conforming...


Who are the high end makers?!??!! NAMES!


You wear Dockers, therefore your opinion is null and void.


+100
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 105 36.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 106 36.9%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 37 12.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 46 16.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 42 14.6%

Forum statistics

Threads
508,306
Messages
10,601,057
Members
224,585
Latest member
vikse584
Top