• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • One of our reviewers recently reviewed the Malloch's Seaweed Newman Roll Neck Jumper. Check out his thoughts on this modern contemporary version of the British submariner jumper here.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Scuppers

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
1,415
But TBH doesn’t look as good…
I quite like the retro look though, and at first I thought it was a very old model.
Now it doesn’t scream Rolex.
Believe the Prince came about in the 1920’s… so define Rolex as you must.
 

Scuppers

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
1,415
Jesus, never thought this post would be so controversial. Let’s move on.
Definitely will cease posting. Can’t imagine what you would make of the rest of my assemblag.
 

Clouseau

Inspector
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
6,750
Reaction score
12,396
Believe the Prince came about in the 1920’s… so define Rolex as you must.
Apparently yours is a contemporary take on the old model.
Personally I don’t see anything controversial, just a discussion, difference of opinion, de gustibus non…etc.
 

Scuppers

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
1,415
Apparently yours is a contemporary take on the old model.
Personally I don’t see anything controversial, just a discussion, opinion,
Of course it is contemporaneous, pink gold was unheard of back then. Before anyone wishes to give a lesson on metallurgy… MSc in Materials science,
 

Clouseau

Inspector
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
6,750
Reaction score
12,396
Of course it is contemporaneous, pink gold was unheard of back then. Before anyone wishes to give a lesson on metallurgy… MSc in Materials science,
You are the one referring to the 1920s ;)
Cool man, it is an interesting watch, a curiosity.
 

mossrockss

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
3,833
Reaction score
8,368
Continuing with my watch journey and quietly absorbing the knowledge here, I'm finally thinking of getting this Tudor 1926. It is two-tone steel and rose gold, but its so subtly done and pleasing in combination with the rose gold hands and numerals and the waffled dial that I feel it gives the little bit of glamour I was looking for.

I had wanted a watch with an in-house movement, but I think I'm willing to forego that for this. Any caveats on the 1926 I should be aware of and which I haven't found online?

I think 41mm is the right size for me?

View attachment 1853337
I think it'd be better in 39mm given its dressy nature.
My dad has the white dial 1926 in 41mm. It slips so easily on the wrist, is silky smooth and comfortable. But I just can't shake the feeling it's best at a smaller size.
 

Featured Sponsor

How do you prefer trousers to be finished?

  • Plain hem

  • Cuffed (1.5 inches or less)

  • Cuffed (more than 1.5 inches)

  • No preference, as long as the proportions work


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
520,932
Messages
10,731,506
Members
229,133
Latest member
rara194
Top