jkidd41011
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 1,670
- Reaction score
- 669
Not sure if I’ve ever posted on this thread but I picked this up last week at a pretty sizable discounted price.
One of our reviewers recently reviewed the Malloch's Seaweed Newman Roll Neck Jumper. Check out his thoughts on this modern contemporary version of the British submariner jumper here.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Perhaps they will email you with an estimate for the amount of time it will take them to complete the work. That's what happened after I dropped of my RO for service.I took my Snoopy 50 to the Omega boutique yesterday. They're going to fix it under warranty but I'm not sure how long it'll take to get my watch back. My watch doesn't wind, chrono doesn't activate, and reset pusher won't activate.
Nice idea in theory. I can't remember what brand it was (maybe Bell & Ross when affiliated with Sinn, or a Breitling or something else) that my friend brought in for service and was given a loaner (probably 15-20 years ago). The loaner was a simple time only model on a strap, it may even have been quartz. Well, while walking through central park, the strap broke or something. He wasn't used to such a thin light watch, and he said he didn't feel it fall off and didn't hear anything hit the ground. He went to the store and told them what happened, and he had to pay them something like $750 or $850 for losing the loaner watch. He asked if they could credit it towards the purchase of a new time piece that is significantly more expensive. They said, no they couldn't. He said, he'd never take a loaner watch again, especially since at the time he had at least 2 other watches and each of those was insured if lost or stolen.super frustrating. I feel like given a lot of luxury watches are more expensive than cars, they should offer loaners. Hublot used to do this!
I read somewhere that ALS used to give out loaner watches in steel. Only issue was that people would rather have the steel watch and not pick up their gold/platinum watch when the service was done.Nice idea in theory. I can't remember what brand it was (maybe Bell & Ross when affiliated with Sinn, or a Breitling or something else) that my friend brought in for service and was given a loaner (probably 15-20 years ago). The loaner was a simple time only model on a strap, it may even have been quartz. Well, while walking through central park, the strap broke or something. He wasn't used to such a thin light watch, and he said he didn't feel it fall off and didn't hear anything hit the ground. He went to the store and told them what happened, and he had to pay them something like $750 or $850 for losing the loaner watch. He asked if they could credit it towards the purchase of a new time piece that is significantly more expensive. They said, no they couldn't. He said, he'd never take a loaner watch again, especially since at the time he had at least 2 other watches and each of those was insured if lost or stolen.
They do have 26 boutiques in China and their economy is not that great right now.
Did they put a big "LOANER" sticker on the watch like loaner cars from dealerships?I read somewhere that ALS used to give out loaner watches in steel. Only issue was that people would rather have the steel watch and not pick up their gold/platinum watch when the service was done.
That wouldn't stop me from keeping the steel ALS. Those have to be super rare and worth a boat load more than the a platinum version.Did they put a big "LOANER" sticker on the watch like loaner cars from dealerships?
Let's be real, no one eyeing a 222 is going to be interested in swapping it out for a chrono or an annual calendar; they fill completely different roles. Nice to know that it's not limited though.Not a limited edition but exclusive to VC boutiques, for 32,000$. At that price, you could get a great complication in the grey market.
Perhaps a mistake, or how it wears on the wrist? The current/new 222 is only 7.95mm, which is thinner than a Royal Oak Extra-Thin/Jumbo which is 8.1mm, and thinner than a 5811/1G Nautilus, which is 8.2mm.I'd like to see that 222 in person but I suspect it might take awhile before I get the chance. The blue looks like a nice shade, not too electric, almost a bit of grey in it.
Some of the reviews seem to indicate it's fairly thicc.
For sure, that's definitely thin by any measurePerhaps a mistake, or how it wears on the wrist? The current/new 222 is only 7.95mm, which is thinner than a Royal Oak Extra-Thin/Jumbo which is 8.1mm, and thinner than a 5811/1G Nautilus, which is 8.2mm.
They have all gotten a bit thicker over the years, in part probably from adding the sapphire case back to view the movements. In addition, in the case of the Nautilus (no pun intended), the movement and case got a little thicker when they changed movements and added a seconds hand. The original was 7.5 and now it's 8.2mm.For sure, that's definitely thin by any measure
I think one of the reviews that I saw was comparing it to the original (with the cal. 1120 movement) which was supposedly closer to 7mm.
or for the foreseeable future.They do have 26 boutiques in China and their economy is not that great right now.
Good to see you again Scuppers. I had thought you and @Riva hadI thought I was the only one to have read Paradise Lost this century.