• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • One of our reviewers recently reviewed the Malloch's Seaweed Newman Roll Neck Jumper. Check out his thoughts on this modern contemporary version of the British submariner jumper here.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

venessian

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
3,204
Reaction score
1,923
View attachment 1594196
i get the critique that the margin of the left subdial is misspent, here's another look with that margin reclaimed by the main dial which gets you a bigger bite of numbers, the asymmetry doesn't much bug me (even so on a dress watch!) as i think it develops a hierarchy along with the hands treatment
But that iteration to me is "6 of one/half-dozen of the other" vis a vis the original. The dials will yes be slightly (annoyingly so?) different sizes, which you and I and others might still accept (esp. if the PR dial was not on axis with the calendar dial but rather off-axis as a lot of other (Lange, RDM, etc) beautiful and coherent dials posted in the past few pages do).

However, the visible portion of the 8 and 10 being larger than the visible portion of the 2 and 4 seems even more odd to me than the original layout, as it would then result in 3 different sizes (the 2 and 4 being cut in half, the 8 being barely whole, and the 10 basically 3/4) for the 4 numerals around the 2 sub-dials.:lookaround: Also, the tangents of the dials relative to center and chapter ring/bezel end up all over the place.
Dornbluth 99.5_01.png

Here without my added red notations. I don't know...you may be right. It looks a little better than I thought, especially of course if the 10 was whole too.
Dornbluth 99.5_01b.png


Nonetheless I prefer the same size dials, with symmetrically cut 4 numerals, but...a non-starter for me either way because I would just not buy cut numerals, even printed ones. Especially because Dornbluth has beautiful (the same font and size) applied numerals, which I think are great and worth the upgrade, but look really sad when chopped.

DB-039.jpg


For me, they should have done the most simple thing, laid out 2 same-size circles, and moved on from there.
 
Last edited:

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,887
Reaction score
10,266
Guys curious, what does this white gold Patek retail for? Does Patek show MSRP prices anywhere? I never looked


The have the list prices on the company website. It’s $49,910.

 

double00

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
18,676
Reaction score
18,794
@venessian that is rad, i committed my smudgery on apple preview haha but you finessed dat modeling

*observed incident* for lack of a better term is a big part of my personal oeuvre (along with the typical-and-good environmental context, program etc.) so i am v comfy exploring the what-ifs of 3 diff numeral solutions if i suspect it may add up in service of concept. the dial ends up sportier here imo

i think i agree re: off-axis, fun stuff, just squeezing dat balloon ha
 

TAFJIR

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
161
Reaction score
93
Not to veer off topic—I love a good occluded numeral discussion as much as the next guy—but I’ve been meaning to ask the group, any thoughts on this new release from RL/The Rake?

I get that it’s not even in the same category as the more classic timepieces, but there’s something about the whimsical nature of it that calls out to me. Think it’d be a fun watch to add to the rotation instead of the GSs I typically wear. Thoughts from the crowd?

https://therake.com/ralph-lauren-bearfoot-negroni-bear-watch.html
 

Attachments

  • FF9B30E6-6183-40D0-9D5D-F9418753FA7F.jpeg
    FF9B30E6-6183-40D0-9D5D-F9418753FA7F.jpeg
    102.4 KB · Views: 34

venessian

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
3,204
Reaction score
1,923
@venessian that is rad, i committed my smudgery on apple preview haha but you finessed dat modeling

*observed incident* for lack of a better term is a big part of my personal oeuvre (along with the typical-and-good environmental context, program etc.) so i am v comfy exploring the what-ifs of 3 diff numeral solutions if i suspect it may add up in service of concept. the dial ends up sportier here imo

i think i agree re: off-axis, fun stuff, just squeezing dat balloon ha
*observed incident* is interesting.

Perhaps along those lines, I worked once on a building for a very creative, really great advertising executive/company in Germany. His main "rule" in design (graphic or in the project we were doing, anything really) was, "To elicit real interest, real exploration, real impact, you always need a quiet but strong 'irritant'. But never a hammer." Pretty amazing guy in many regards.

The Dornbluth 99.5 and some other watches here are not really that imo; they go way past the "quiet or even subliminal irritant" aspect.
 
Last edited:

chocomallo

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
2,324

TheFoo, I am just curious what your overall view on watch wear is. You won't buy a watch with any shop wear (see prior posts about the 5170 and why you had the AD send you the Daytona instead of waiting a few days to pick up). But then you immediately had LAWW brush the watch, so should a little shop wear matter?

Then you said you let your son suck on your 5296 (in reference to the guy whose dog ate his Patek (sorry I forgot who posted that)), but you made the post linked above about how you overpolished it to get some minor scratches out and you are heart broken. Even considering a re-case if that what it takes.

You also posted about wanting to get the original ceramic IWC pilot watch (I don't know the model), but you decided against a used model because IWC wouldn't replace the case.

What is the deal? This is an honest question and I have no intention to enrage you given our past exchanges. You are very deliberate and always have a reason, so I would appreciate to understand you stance. Cheers!

By the way, are you sure the bezel and mid-case are one piece? Not a Patek, but I badly scratched the bezel on a Chopard and was convinced it was a one piece bezel and mid-case. But it was actually two pieces. Still cost a fortune to replace, though.
 

Featured Sponsor

How do you prefer trousers to be finished?

  • Plain hem

  • Cuffed (1.5 inches or less)

  • Cuffed (more than 1.5 inches)

  • No preference, as long as the proportions work


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
520,927
Messages
10,731,361
Members
229,126
Latest member
bobbies
Top