- Joined
- Mar 8, 2002
- Messages
- 57,648
- Reaction score
- 36,512
I haven't read the exchange, so I'm not going to comment on it. I do think that single line "This is boring" comments are generally dumb, on any forum. On Styleforum. we would never ban someone on that basis alone, but the collective response would be a very well merited "meh". That unsupported type of statement is not a conversation starter. I don't really understand the rules of SZ. Maybe it's explicitly or implicitly agreed that you don't post unless you are going to post a detailed critique. I suppose that that would be fair enough, but to me, at least, it would make for a very stilted conversation.Sinnedk I get what you wanted to do but simply saying that you think Deepti is boring and you don't like it will not start a discussion. You need evidence to support your opinion, especially on forums like SZ, where simply replying 'lol' will not fly.
The guy that said you're uniformed was kinda right. You said Deepti is an extension of CCP (look who is an 'extension' of the Continues Collection), and thats largely true since she was the pattern maker for CCP and basically stuck with the same patterns she originally created (hence faust's comment). But, she has also experimented with new techniques. Glass lapels, zig zag zipper/seams, silver infused fabric; probs others but I don't follow the brand. Wether you like what she's produced or not, it's not boring. Repetitive, maybe.
SZ would be better without Faust though. He's a toxic asset
I don't have a particularly strong opinion on Deepti's work, one way or the other.
WTF?Perfectos, not double riders. "What I am afraid most of is one of those basic bitches trying to find communion in the fact that both of us are technically wearing perfectos."
I wrote a (vaguely funny) line in the journal about double riders being the standard uniform of college co-eds. But the above, in the context of the conversation of SZ, seems completely earnest and devoid of any humor whatsoever.