fassbinder
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 149
Well in this post he implies he does Ralph's suits for the movie:
http://www.timothyeverest.co.uk/blog/?p=1258
http://www.timothyeverest.co.uk/blog/?p=1258
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I see what you mean, but even the look you're describing was not executed well with the cut of Bond's suits. That look can be made much better, especially without the ridiculous tightness. It's true that slim suits look modern, but there's two types of slim: Slim in the correct places with purpose, and just tight from sizing down too much. The costume designer either didn't do enough research, or had no idea how to achieve the look she wanted...or both.
Here's an example to illustrate what I mean:
1. Slim, but still fitting well:
2. Bond's suits in the movie:
Now, one might argue that Craig's shape is very different that the guys above, but that's no reason to make suits tight. He should look even better in a well-fitting, slim suit.
I was just not a big fan of him having tab collars on every outfit. Where the hell did that come from?
And I really am not much of a fan of shawl tuxedos....I would say that this was the weakest Bond wardrobe of any non-Roger Moore Bond flick...except maybe License to Kill.
What is up with Mallory's shirt in this pic? Not ironed? lol.
I don't see why the design of that tie would be unique to Charvet. A great number of shops along Jermyn Street (and shops within the 1.5 lm radius) sell ties like these. Certainly Charvet sells such ties too.
Someone suggested in another topic (or earlier in this, I'm not sure) that it may have something to do with Bond getting older, and so he stands in distinction to the new clothing (which I may be interpreting a bit charitably, but you get the point). I'm not sure this is correct, but maybe that's another way to look at it.