STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
This all looks excellent - I will be visiting Graham Browne in a couple of weeks to get my Dashing Tweeds number started... nice to see some DT pieces in the window!
Russell told me each batch is rather limited, each cloth design should supply 5-6 suits maximum
Not sure whether this is only a salesman technique, but have fun on your commission
I pack those shirt, tie and shoes in my backpack, so it may not be the freshest thing
How come no love on the shirts? I can understand you might hate the tie combination because I just grab the tie without any thoughts to the fitting
The shirts are a bit loud. But anyway, the main point is this is an awesome thread! Thanks so much for posting all those pictures/descriptions. The suit looks like it's going to be very bad ass.
This all looks excellent - I will be visiting Graham Browne in a couple of weeks to get my Dashing Tweeds number started... nice to see some DT pieces in the window!
I prefer a fuller lapel with more presence on a peaked DB, but different strokes I guess. Those sleeves definitely need more length though.
It is extremely irritating that the fish tail back was omitted - how high are the trousers cut without it? Was any excuse offered?
It is looking generally good although I must agree that the sleeves are far too short: I hope that was spotted as you cannot accept it in that condition. I feel that the lapels are 'right' for you - any wider would be disproportionate, the coat generally is good apart from the sleeves.
One thought though - the coat is quite well fitting through the body so do you intended to use the inner pockets? You have no back pockets in the trousers so I do wonder if using the inside pockets will create dreadful bulges even with a slim wallet etc. How many inside pockets have you had? Even if you only have one - that should be allowed for in the cut, I fear that it is not.
This lapel is ok for me, perhaps I am just not used to the conservative shape, but the more I look at the picture the more I accepted it, it is very understated and elegant, Perfect for any environment without being too loud, I had a few lord TF suit anyway so that is a good addition
The trouser is cut high waisted, just on my belly button, I do like my trouser high as this is more comfortable in the hot weather, unlike most who will prefer a good half inch below it. there is no right or wrong lapel shape, I personally preferred it nice and big, but this is a good additional to my non conservative collection.
I rarely use any breast pockets, I always carry a portfolio bag or small briefcase with me, so I put everything except my tiny nokia phone into my pocket, the stuff I put inside will be a white cotton PS for wiping sweat, and my oyster or any bus ticket only. I rarely bring large amount of money, usually someone will pay for the lunch and stuff.
The trouser are for some coins (frankly only in UK because HK's conner shops are paid with HK oyster card these days, and any transportation except taxi) and the little phone. There are 3 pockets inside the jacket, my seperate credit cards and oyster and a hanky. I am try to smoke less so inability to put a cig box inside is great idea.
And really the coat is not skin tight, Russell only is doing Micro adjustment for it. Sleeves is spotted by both of us, but I can't blame him because the last shirt I worn to the fitting, so that will be fixed as well. I should also have insisted Russell to put 'fishtail' on my order sheet before I left the shop last time after the basted fitting, it is frustrated for my next item to have one
Do you Like where the lapels cross? It seems very high and shows very little tie and shirt. There are different reasons for this, one is the buttoning point is very high. If this is what you want then ignore my comment.