• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Discussions about the fashion industry thread

BlakeRVA

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
754
Reaction score
2,007
Okay but just to keep things in perspective... the global footwear industry, its marketing, and its relevance is WAY different than when Jordan Brand started.

Jessica Simpson was doing $1 billion in 2014. With the smallest fraction of the star power that Ye has. And without Adidas as a partner.
Is Jessica Simpson, who was sold in Macy’s and Target all across the mid-West even remotely equivalent to premium streetwear from Yeezy or any other hip-hop adjacent brand? If it’s so easy, why are Kanye and Jordan the only two to ever surpass $1B in sales, but Sean John, Rocawear, Billionaire Boys Club, Golf Wang and others haven’t?

Also, if Adidas just need a celeb endorsement they could have enlisted Drake or Travis Scott and saved themselves hundreds of millions in royalties.

You don’t have to agree with Kanye’s antics or even appreciate his design aesthetic, but I’m so sick of people acting like Kanye or Virgil’s success is illegitimate. Please give them their flowers.
 

sushijerk

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
2,070
Reaction score
9,097
If there is any credit I give Ye in the fashion space it is that he never sold generic logo clothing with star power behind it. He could have pushed literally anything with success but went with shoe shapes/construction that went against the trend history of hip hop culture and that I'm sure most insiders considered bizarre and unsellable.

I've never bought any Yzy and probably never would but I usually think Kanye looks cool in it, and thought David Letterman looked great in a Yzy outfit when he went to interview Ye at his home.
 

Epaulet

Affiliate Vendor
Affiliate Vendor
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
13,081
Reaction score
11,326
Is Jessica Simpson, who was sold in Macy’s and Target all across the mid-West even remotely equivalent to premium streetwear from Yeezy or any other hip-hop adjacent brand? If it’s so easy, why are Kanye and Jordan the only two to ever surpass $1B in sales, but Sean John, Rocawear, Billionaire Boys Club, Golf Wang and others haven’t?

Also, if Adidas just need a celeb endorsement they could have enlisted Drake or Travis Scott and saved themselves hundreds of millions in royalties.

You don’t have to agree with Kanye’s antics or even appreciate his design aesthetic, but I’m so sick of people acting like Kanye or Virgil’s success is illegitimate. Please give them their flowers.

Well first... I admired Virgil a lot and appreciated his work. Seemed like a genuinely good person too, so you won't hear a single criticism like that from me. Not sure who that's directed at. I think that being Ye-adjacent made all the difference in Virgil and Jerry Lorenzo's career, but that doesn't mean that they're not talented. And lots of fashion brands were built off of celebrity connections.

Jessica Simpson is an apt comparison as she's a celebrity who launched a successful shoe line. The stuff is higher priced than Target, but I think that outlets like Macys and Zappos are some of their chief outlets. The point is: that Jordan Brand $1 billion mark isn't some unbelievably unattainable goal that only a unique talent like Yeezus could ever reach. The actress from the "Dukes of Hazzard" did it 8 years ago. Just takes good marketing skills, a solid business partner, and knowing your customer.

I wouldn't put Yeezy in with those other brands simply because Ye is (largely known to be) a hip hop musician. It's definitely a far more serious and far better funded collection than Rocawear. Although... if it wasn't for Adidas, I'd bet good money that it might do less business than Sean John. Only because Ye can't seem to help but continually sabotage himself with his retail collections.

And I don't think that Ye's success is illegitimate. I never said that. Either way, billions of dollars of products with his stamp were sold around the world. If we define legitimate retail success as "people buy the stuff and talk about it," then yes, he's a huge legitimate success. The crazy reseller culture is clear evidence of how desirable his stuff is.

I'm just sharing my opinion that I personally think his clothing designs are derivative and lousy, and I think he's an awful human being. I feel like there's a pretty good amount of evidence for both of those points.
 

winston86dit

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
389
Virgil was a guy with a blog before he started working for Kanye. Facts
So you’re saying Virgil gained all his creativity by osmosis? That seems, again, like an extremely flawed logic and one that completely takes away the individual talent of the people within Kanye’s orbit.

For instance; Did Kanye only make great music by working with someone like Rick Rubin?

To rip someone of their creativity because of their proximity to someone else is extremely naive. Kanye is talented no doubt, but he is reliant on a cadre of designers, stylists, producers, directors, and handlers, all of whom bring something to the table.

It was a new shape that he created with his cultural power that fueled Yeezy to a billion dollar brand in a blink of an eye. It took Jordan brand about 25 years+ to get to $1B.
I’m sorry but, what does that even mean? A new shape created by culture? None of what has been created for Yeezy is particularly ground breaking. Not that it’s particularly bad either. But creating a sneaker silhouette is something that is quantifiable (last, form, materials, toe shape, etc), which is why I asked the question.
 

sushijerk

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
2,070
Reaction score
9,097
So you’re saying Virgil gained all his creativity by osmosis? That seems, again, like an extremely flawed logic and one that completely takes away the individual talent of the people within Kanye’s orbit.

For instance; Did Kanye only make great music by working with someone like Rick Rubin?

To rip someone of their creativity because of their proximity to someone else is extremely naive. Kanye is talented no doubt, but he is reliant on a cadre of designers, stylists, producers, directors, and handlers, all of whom bring something to the table.


I’m sorry but, what does that even mean? A new shape created by culture? None of what has been created for Yeezy is particularly ground breaking. Not that it’s particularly bad either. But creating a sneaker silhouette is something that is quantifiable (last, form, materials, toe shape, etc), which is why I asked the question.
While I'm not sure what London means exactly, I think it is pretty fair to say Virgil, as talented and nice as he is, would not have received the attention he did in the top tier of the fashion industry if Kanye was not constantly using his own star power and influence to put him into the scene.
 

winston86dit

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
389
While I'm not sure what London means exactly, I think it is pretty fair to say Virgil, as talented and nice as he is, would not have received the attention he did in the top tier of the fashion industry if Kanye was not constantly using his own star power and influence to put him into the scene.
That is somewhat understandable but also something that is completely unverifiable. Celebrity matters sure, but it seems dismissive to say that someone couldn’t have made it or been as successful if it weren’t for one man.
 

winston86dit

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
389
I will also say, one thing Kanye should get a lot of credit for is the creative company he keeps. He’s been particularly good at surrounding himself with talented individuals. He didn’t hire people like Steven Smith because he’s a scrub.
 

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
57,617
Reaction score
36,473
Is Jessica Simpson, who was sold in Macy’s and Target all across the mid-West even remotely equivalent to premium streetwear from Yeezy or any other hip-hop adjacent brand? If it’s so easy, why are Kanye and Jordan the only two to ever surpass $1B in sales, but Sean John, Rocawear, Billionaire Boys Club, Golf Wang and others haven’t?

Also, if Adidas just need a celeb endorsement they could have enlisted Drake or Travis Scott and saved themselves hundreds of millions in royalties.

You don’t have to agree with Kanye’s antics or even appreciate his design aesthetic, but I’m so sick of people acting like Kanye or Virgil’s success is illegitimate. Please give them their flowers.
To be fair, @Epaulet was contiining to use Jessica Simpson as an example because @London had mentioned that "... his cultural power that fueled Yeezy to a billion dollar brand in a blink of an eye. It took Jordan brand about 25 years+ to get to $1B."

Also, while no one is going to write about the Jessican Simpson's contributions to fashion, from an ethnographic POV, she's significant. It's like... cargo shorts and flip flops. If cargo shorts weren't culturally relevant, they could not be memed.

Frankly, the same goes for Kanye.

I suppose that being compared to each other is probably part of their own personal hell.;
 

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
57,617
Reaction score
36,473
While I'm not sure what London means exactly, I think it is pretty fair to say Virgil, as talented and nice as he is, would not have received the attention he did in the top tier of the fashion industry if Kanye was not constantly using his own star power and influence to put him into the scene.
This. Virgil definitely was given a lot of clout by Kanye. That takes nothing away from Virgil's talent.
 

Epaulet

Affiliate Vendor
Affiliate Vendor
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
13,081
Reaction score
11,326
To be fair, @Epaulet was contiining to use Jessica Simpson as an example because @London had mentioned that "... his cultural power that fueled Yeezy to a billion dollar brand in a blink of an eye. It took Jordan brand about 25 years+ to get to $1B."

Also, while no one is going to write about the Jessican Simpson's contributions to fashion, from an ethnographic POV, she's significant. It's like... cargo shorts and flip flops. If cargo shorts weren't culturally relevant, they could not be memed.

Frankly, the same goes for Kanye.

I suppose that being compared to each other is probably part of their own personal hell.;

Well Jessica Simpson never idiotically ran for President or called slavery "a choice" in the United States or publically harassed her ex, or said "BILL COSBY INNOCENT!!!" or brought Marilyn Manson to her pseudo-church right after a slew of sexual harassment and violence allegations.

So yeah, I could imagine she wouldn't appreciate being compared to him. I think this sums it up nicely...

ye.jpg
 

London

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
1,954
Reaction score
649
why the hell are you comparing Kanye to Jessica Simpson first of all?

Well Jessica Simpson never idiotically ran for President or called slavery "a choice" in the United States or publically harassed her ex, or said "BILL COSBY INNOCENT!!!" or brought Marilyn Manson to her pseudo-church right after a slew of sexual harassment and violence allegations.

So yeah, I could imagine she wouldn't appreciate being compared to him. I think this sums it up nicely...

View attachment 1832892
 

Epaulet

Affiliate Vendor
Affiliate Vendor
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
13,081
Reaction score
11,326
why the hell are you comparing Kanye to Jessica Simpson first of all?

You mentioned that it took Jordan Brand 25 years to reach $1 billion in annual sales. And how Ye eclipsed that.

I mentioned that Jessica Simpson... another celebrity who entered the footwear arena... did $1 billion in annual sales in 2014. So while the Yeezy collection is certainly a huge success at retail, it's not the only brand to beat that number.

Jessica Simpson is a nice counterpoint because she's just a smart businesswoman who's able do this without the ridiculous hype and anti-social behavior and disrespecting her partners and making her customers jump through hoops that we've come to expect from Ye.

But that dislike is admittedly a personal thing from me. This is the discussion of the fashion industry thread, and from that perspective.. Ye is killing it with sales volume, product sell through, and marketing. Absolutely no denying that. I'm very grateful that I don't have to work with him though.
 

London

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
1,954
Reaction score
649
Jordan and Yeezy are like for like competing for the same customer. Jessica Simpson and Kanye are in totally different worlds and spheres of influence.

You mentioned that it took Jordan Brand 25 years to reach $1 billion in annual sales. And how Ye eclipsed that.

I mentioned that Jessica Simpson... another celebrity who entered the footwear arena... did $1 billion in annual sales in 2014. So while the Yeezy collection is certainly a huge success at retail, it's not the only brand to beat that number.

Jessica Simpson is a nice counterpoint because she's just a smart businesswoman who's able do this without the ridiculous hype and anti-social behavior and disrespecting her partners and making her customers jump through hoops that we've come to expect from Ye.

But that dislike is admittedly a personal thing from me. This is the discussion of the fashion industry thread, and from that perspective.. Ye is killing it with sales volume, product sell through, and marketing. Absolutely no denying that. I'm very grateful that I don't have to work with him though.
 

double00

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
17,101
Reaction score
17,678
supreme might be a better comparison as a niche streetwear label , more like 500M annual revenue ( although it would be fascinating to see what the products achieve on secondary markets ) , started in 1994 , sold for what 2B ...
 

London

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
1,954
Reaction score
649
supreme might be a better comparison as a niche streetwear label , more like 500M annual revenue ( although it would be fascinating to see what the products achieve on secondary markets ) , started in 1994 , sold for what 2B ...
Yeah secondary markets are a whole different thing that the brands are trying to figure out How to get a piece of.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 97 37.0%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 94 35.9%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 31 11.8%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 44 16.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 40 15.3%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
507,410
Messages
10,595,981
Members
224,417
Latest member
aharon
Top