Bob Loblaw
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2006
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 26
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Is this that suspender looking thing you see detectives wear on TV and whatnot?
Quote for emphasis. Anyways, judging from the photo of the back of the suit, it doesn't look like it fits at all. There's tons of scrunching everywhere.
nice suits! u can buy these online?
Sorry but the suits look pretty disastrous. Given you've been lurking here a while, I'm surprised you consider them to be good. I'm not even sure where to start with a critique...
I really don't see what the big problem is to be honest... That man with the custom "Paul Chang" suit also had scrunching in the back. It wasn't nearly as scrutinized, like at all. I agree, it definitely should look a little cleaner in the back. I can still pull of a professional, stylish look with it, which is the important thing to me.
Please do not be so definsive, it will not help you and you will not garner the education you seem to seek. If you are hear to brag about your inexpensive suits, please realize you did not go about it in a way that was going to succeed. That said, I think its great you are interested in suits and hope you do learn what the hallmarks of fine tailoring is and can incorporate some of this in the future.
I really don't see what the big problem is to be honest... That man with the custom "Paul Chang" suit also had scrunching in the back. It wasn't nearly as scrutinized, like at all. I agree, it definitely should look a little cleaner in the back. I can still pull of a professional, stylish look with it, which is the important thing to me.
Oh yeah, it's pretty bad back, shoulders, arms, underarms there, based on the pictures. I'm not a tailor but it's a poorly made suit. Seriously, no joke, you would have been better off going to Target! It was just put together all wrong, I don't think it can even be fixed. Get a refund if you can and chalk it up to a lesson learned, I've made my fair share of mistakes in the past. Learn before you buy... you wouldn't buy a car or even a TV like you bought this suit, would you?
I really don't see what the big problem is to be honest...
Perhaps you could give me your opinions on the rest of the suit though, how do the shoulders look, chest, etc.
I usually have a pretty good sense of style, since it's something I've always found important; and I like my suits. I tried on a few Armani suits at a Sax 5th outlet store (in Oxnard actually) about a year back, and I honestly like these ones just as much. Though again, I admit the back could use some work.
Not too far away at all then, Michael. Interesting. I'll try those searches. As far as being a little more work... well I've always believed the things worth doing usually are, especially to get the results you want. I'll also check out the article from Kabbaz. Thank you for the tips
I'm very curious if I had lied, and said the suit cost $900, or even $1500 from a custom tailor in the US or something if the criticism had been nearly as harsh. Psychology of a cheap price tag may play a small part here I think.
Would you please take a picture of the part underneath the collar (lift the collar up and take a picture of what lies beneath) to display the lack of felt under the collar? Thank you.
I think you'd get more flak for paying that much for such a suit that looked like that.
I'm sorry, but he is right: Btw, Eason has posted pics here... have a look at the WAYWT-thread in SW&D.
No felt under there, not sure what that means? I've never had a shirt with felt under the collar.
That's, 6, count 'em 6, shots. IT'S A MOVIE -- IT'S NOT REAL!!!! Mine's a 5-er... and a revolver