The WAYWT Discussion Thread

Mr. Moo · Mar 10, 2011

Originally Posted by syntonic

What shoes (or boots) are these?

Crockett & Jones for Ralph Lauren 'Darlton' in shell cordovan.

robbie · Mar 10, 2011

Originally Posted by clark kent

still awkward, but hopefully not as bad.

i like this.

aether · Mar 10, 2011

i thought themselves was otter...

Biscotti · Mar 10, 2011

aeglus · Mar 10, 2011

synthese looks awesome; I like everything in that fit

Originally Posted by Cheese1

Clothes aren't supposed to make you think of the other person naked. If that was the point, why would people wear clothes to begin with?

dunno man I see plenty of clothes that seem like they were meant for just that reason

cowsareforeating · Mar 10, 2011

hey aeglus need moar fits! loved your last one.

Fycus · Mar 10, 2011

Originally Posted by Lane

look here ******, dont you have a womens rights protest to attend?.

Originally Posted by Lane

http://img2.moonbuggy.org/imgstore/what-the-****-am-i-reading.png

g transistor · Mar 10, 2011

I actually really like the button-up in Synth's fit. With it on, the top's got a slight biz-cash feel, but then you look at the whole thing and it turns into slight biz-cash-gonna-****-yr-girl-in-the-office vibe.

APK · Mar 10, 2011

The button-down and Cloak blazer are too fitting/structured compared to the free-flowing tee. I think the Cloak piece would complement the tee well, but the inclusion of the button-down in between those layers is creating this jarring wedge effect.

engines · Mar 10, 2011

V neck/514

Knisse · Mar 10, 2011

Originally Posted by engines

V neck/514

I do not think that t-shirt does you any good

Woodyear · Mar 10, 2011

Originally Posted by APK

You posted a few days ago that "anyone who thinks that dudes posting on a forum about fashion and style is girly or gay is an immature redneck." Yet you later vocalize your pity for Uncontrol, who "so obviously wants to be female." This assertion, by the way, is based on nothing other than his personal style. Unless you're an "immature redneck," your posts are non-cohesive contradictions...brotha.

So let me get this straight, you think that my view that being interested in how you look doesnt necessarily make you effeminate is contradictory to feeling pity for cross dressers/ transexuals? Not only does your conclusion (that i am somehow a hypocrate for holding these two completely seperate and unrelated beliefs) not follow from your flawed arguments, your conclusion doesnt even make sense. You know what seperates man from animals is our ability to reason, you should try it sometime....BROTHA.

Woodyear · Mar 10, 2011

From the parts you highlighted im also gathering you misread that quote (lack of reading comprehension again). I was not saying that people who read this forum are girly or gay, i was stating that precisely anyone who holds such an opinion (that style forumers are girly or gay soley by virtue of being members of style forum) is in fact an immature redneck. I never claimed uncontrol is effeminate by virtue of caring about how he looks and or being a member of styleforum. Uncontrol is effeminate according to the very definition of effeminate: looking and presumably acting feminine insofar as his actions include carying a purse, wearing tons of jewelry and wearing skin tight clothing. The picture that lane posted was of a man obviously dressed as a female, if you want to argue that dressing as a female doesnt make one effeminate but is rather merely a consequence of being on a forum about style and or caring about ones looks and dress, then you are obviously an idiot.

GraphicNovelty · Mar 10, 2011

tl;dr

Lane · Mar 10, 2011

Originally Posted by Woodyear

From the parts you highlighted im also gathering you misread that quote (lack of reading comprehension again). I was not saying that people who read this forum are girly or gay, i was stating that precisely anyone who holds such an opinion (that style forumers are girly or gay soley by virtue of being members of style forum) is in fact an immature redneck. I never claimed uncontrol is effeminate by virtue of caring about how he looks and or being a member of styleforum. Uncontrol is effeminate according to the very definition of effeminate: looking and presumably acting feminine insofar as his actions include carying a purse, wearing tons of jewelry and wearing skin tight clothing. The picture that lane posted was of a man obviously dressed as a female, if you want to argue that dressing as a female doesnt make one effeminate but is rather merely a consequence of being on a forum about style and or caring about ones looks and dress, then you are obviously an idiot.

Its my way of showing whats on the inside. Its like any other style here where people aspire to something. I'm communicating my inner me through this style, and I really could care less about how its perceived as "effemminate" to you. Lots of people dress in certain ways on here where they try to capture their personality because its simply to evoke something to others.

The WAYWT Discussion Thread

Boxercise Toughguy

Pleading Poverty

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Senior Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Stylish Dinosaur

New Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Streetwear Featured products

Similar threads

Featured Sponsor

Plain hem

Cuffed (1.5 inches or less)

Cuffed (more than 1.5 inches)

No preference, as long as the proportions work

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

FOLLOW STYLEFORUM ON: