Amide Hadelin is right offering up to 40% off their excellent selection of exclusive menswear and accessories, including this Lambswool cable knit shawl collar cardigan made by a family business bon the Scottish borderlands. Please use code: SF10 at checkout for an extra 10% olf. Sale end February 2.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Yes, I've read both and think they're both 'pop' books in my opinion. Too silicon valley-esque. The one and only book you really need to read to get a good understanding of money theory is Henry Hazlitt's Economics in one lesson.
Best. Book. Ever. I really need to read it again.
Has anyone read Black Swan or Fooled by Randomness?
Best. Book. Ever.
Hazlitt is the best source for basic principles. For bonus points, EiOL can be found used for cheap. If you want a textbook, Mankiw is standard for a good reason. As for popular economics books, my favorite is Steven Landsberg's Armchair Economist. But there are others from David Friedman, Tyler Cowen, Tim Harford, and of course, Steven Levitt (Freakonomics). I would also recommend Milton Friedman's Capitalism and Freedom or Free to Choose. And from F. A. Hayek there is the classic The Road to Serfdom as well as The Fatal Conceit. For history of economic theory there's Heilbroner's The Worldly Philosophers. My friends at Cato love P. J. O'Rourke's On the Wealth of Nations, in which he explains Adams Smith reasonably well. However, I find him boorish and not at all witty. Which would be fine if he didn't think himself witty, which he does. But he does take the crucial step of covering Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments, which is important in understanding WoN. As a rule, I don't recommend "business" books. They tend to be bad. But then I've only read a few.