jwphillips
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 1
I'm a big fan of the Pratt knot
Last edited:
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
This one for sure.
Double Windsor ... same as the quintuple Windsor (pictured in the first part of the thread) without the final half-hitch knot. It is traditionally a formal knot, but I just like it.
Much more practical for standard tie lengths than the Q-Windsor, but needs much more precision and time than e.g. half-Windsor.
I suspect there overlapping nomenclature here?
FIH = half Windsor?
Pratt = full Windsor?
I suspect there overlapping nomenclature here?
FIH = half Windsor?
Pratt = full Windsor?
I suspect there overlapping nomenclature here?
FIH = half Windsor?
Pratt = full Windsor?
No...Double Windsor ... same as the quintuple Windsor (pictured in the first part of the thread) without the final half-hitch knot. It is traditionally a formal knot, but I just like it.
Much more practical for standard tie lengths than the Q-Windsor, but needs much more precision and time than e.g. half-Windsor.
I suspect there overlapping nomenclature here?
FIH = half Windsor?
Pratt = full Windsor?
Easy let me explain:
Edward VIII, fashion icon of tie knots, including FIH: married an American, triggering a constitutional crisis, leaving UK bereft of a leader on the rise of the third Reich.
My point was there are errors (of nomenclature) and marrying Americans.
His father, George V, invented the Windsor knot.