MattRiv
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2015
- Messages
- 1,207
- Reaction score
- 965
Not off topic at all. Please post more pics during the renovation process!
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Not off topic at all. Please post more pics during the renovation process!
Quote:
+1. Not off topic. The US shoes are mentioned most because that is what people purchase. I would personally like to hear more about any vintage shoes, including the UK offerings. It would be very helpful to also hear any size comparisons of the UK shoes with those of the US. For example, I found the 44.5 G Church's oxford was significantly looser/tighter/narrower, etc that the 11 EEE Florsheim/AE/Alden, etc. And yes, share pictures of the rehab in progress on your EG shoes.
A story that I read in the, I think, old AE thread was about the head of operations of either Hanover or Florsheim. Anyway, the guys were complaining that AE shell shoes had a lot of bowing and the reason for that is that AE doesn't leave their shoes in the lasts long enough after making them. Well, somebody chimed in that head of this old shoe company had all these pairs of shell shoes all over his office, still in their lasts, so that the shell could mold to the last. I think he insisted that the shoes remain in the last for a good number of days.Welcome to the thread. Yes, its a mystery that will likely never be solved. I agree that it was not likely done for aesthetics, so that leaves some practical benefit as an explanation. Saved time in construction? Lowered the cost in some manner? Perhaps the multiple smaller pieces of leather allowed them to obtain a higher yield from the leather they were using for the uppers? Who knows. Its all part of the enjoyment I get from vintage shoes.
This is some straight up AskAndy craziness - who the hell wants to wear some dead guys shoes?
Weird
I've been warning against this for years.
There are some very nice vintage shoes in this thread ..I love to see them, a revelation in some cases.
And, of course, there is no problem with NOS. But thrifted shoes--esp. good quality thrifted shoes--will never fit correctly no matter who you are, and often...very, very, very often....harbour bacteria and fungal spores from the original owner.
It's like wearing someone's used...and unwashed...smallclothes (underwear).
Would it help to know that vintage shoes are a hobby for some of us?
I own own and wear shoes I bought new. Nice shoes. I am pretty sure all people on this thread wear new shoes. But sometimes we also buy and wear vintage shoes.
I regularly buy shoes that I will never wear. But I like the style of the shoe. I post or blog about shoes that don't fit me. Maybe that makes no sense but I do. Some people buy books they will never read. Others buy toys they keep in the package.
The thread is called "Vintage dress shoe appreciation". If someone went to a classic cars forum and posted that a Tesla or Prius is a better car than 1967 Camaro, they would be right. But they are missing the point.
This is some straight up AskAndy craziness - who the hell wants to wear some dead guys shoes?
Weird
I've been warning against this for years.
There are some very nice vintage shoes in this thread ..I love to see them, a revelation in some cases.
And, of course, there is no problem with NOS. But thrifted shoes--esp. good quality thrifted shoes--will never fit correctly no matter who you are, and often...very, very, very often....harbour bacteria and fungal spores from the original owner.
It's like wearing someone's used...and unwashed...smallclothes (underwear).
1940s Nettleton Ventilated Spade Spectators