academe
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 1,872
- Reaction score
- 234
Hello folks - I haven't posted here or on Styleforum for a few years now, but just wanted to share photos of my latest acquisition:
And for the newer members of this thread, the gratuitous family photo:
...Looks like I may need to get a new watch box!
Edit: More deets on the PAM. It's the new 1392 with a 1950 Luminor case, 42 mm diameter, sandwich dial (probably obvious from the picture), and upgraded P.9010 movement (automatic with a three day power reserve). The newer P.9010 is thinner than its predecessor (P.9000), so the PAM 1392 fits more easily under a shirt cuff than the 392. The P.9010 also has a quick set hour hand, which makes moving between time zones that little bit easier (I travel quite a bit for work). Some Paneristi may scoff at the smaller case size, date window and automatic movement, but as a smaller-wristed gentleman who travels often for work, the case size, date, quick-set hour hand, and automatic movement make this a very practical choice for me.
And for the newer members of this thread, the gratuitous family photo:
...Looks like I may need to get a new watch box!
Edit: More deets on the PAM. It's the new 1392 with a 1950 Luminor case, 42 mm diameter, sandwich dial (probably obvious from the picture), and upgraded P.9010 movement (automatic with a three day power reserve). The newer P.9010 is thinner than its predecessor (P.9000), so the PAM 1392 fits more easily under a shirt cuff than the 392. The P.9010 also has a quick set hour hand, which makes moving between time zones that little bit easier (I travel quite a bit for work). Some Paneristi may scoff at the smaller case size, date window and automatic movement, but as a smaller-wristed gentleman who travels often for work, the case size, date, quick-set hour hand, and automatic movement make this a very practical choice for me.
Last edited: