- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 10,517
- Reaction score
- 28,187
I’ve been mulling on this today because I have been contemplating whether to get a third watch recently. I am leaning toward the 5960 steel white dial. I want a watch with a bracelet that I can wear once it gets hot due to the humid summers in Tokyo. I love the apertures on the 5960 (hence my love of the 5205). But I dislike the lack of a running second hand. Of course I can run the chrono constantly, but that’s cheating I think. Were I to go the perpetual route, I would get a 5050. It’s got apertures and running seconds and also a retrograde date. Did you consider the 5050? Do you prefer subdials over apertures? Curious how you arrived at the 3940.
I love the 5960 white dial. One of my favorite sub-$100,000 Patek references of the past 15 years. I think it is one of the better examples of Patek dressing down a dress watch.
I love the 5050. Between the 5050J and the standard 3940J, it would have been a tougher call but I still would have landed on the 3940J. A significant differentiator, in my opinion, is the thickness - the 5050 is more than 25% thicker. That is meaningful to me, as I favor thin dress watches. I find that the 3940 case is more sinuous as well, although the cases are admittedly similar. Ultimately, I landed on the 3941 that I purchased because of the gilt dial and the reference itself.