partenopean
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2016
- Messages
- 164
- Reaction score
- 141
Agreed.Well, to play devil's advocate, those questions are of no practical importance to most people. The shoes are used sparingly enough tht a resole will typically never be necessary. The shoes could be Goodyear welted or Blake Rapid, and it would all be the same to people.
Goodyear welted became a popular selling point in the mind 00s, when English shoe brands became popular, and was mentioned as a sign of quality in all of the copy to signify quality workmanship. If I were a betting man, I would say that most people, including guys interested in fine clothing, would not have been aware of a lot of the construction details that were brought to the higher end customer's attention at around that time, amplified by the then nascent online menswear enthusiasts ecosystem.
It's very easy to imagine an alterna-world, with just slight differences in history, I think that we could all be talking about the Rapid Blake stitch used in many better made Italian made shoes. I know that some knowledgeable people like this construction more @RIDER.
Getting to the point in a very round-about way (sorry, I've written this post between dealing with other things), while there are certain construction methods that are objectively better for a variety of reasons than others, a lot of the value to customers is in story of quality, rather than in the practical need for a certain level of quality. For enthusiasts like ourselves, of course we want Goodyear or hand welted or Blake Rapid, but for the vast majority of people, it's pretty immaterial.
I was brought up to equate Goodyear welted with Church's, although of course, many other brands have them.
I grew up in the UK, so getting your first pair of Church's to start work in the City was a rite of passage. Many of us were told the Goodyear double-welt kept water out, making the shoes watertight, as long as we carried an umbrella and regulary used beeswax! I still don't know if thats true, because even then, I noticed my Blake-welted Tods kept water out too!
Churchs were English-made with a long heritage, so we were told they had to be better than the Italian brands (usually lumped together as "Ferragamos").
The other thing was when you went to the Church's stores in Central London, they were always very full with very loud (deafeningly so) Italian tourists trying on various styles. Whatever they were saying was deafening, and also to me, unintelligellible, as the only English used was to praise Churches as "besa shooz in the wauld!" to anyone nearby that looked their way.
That helped reinforce the dogma of Churchs' superiority.
That was 2005, though, when shoes mattered and casual Friday meant pink Ralph Lauren shirt, blue blazer and loose fitting chinos with brown (not black, brown) Churches. Derbys were the style of choice.
Churchs saw their prestige slowly decline, and today of course, casual Friday is dead because the office is partly dead and casual Friday is black T-shirt or polo shirt and some slim-fitting jeans! Emphasis is on avant-garde coiffes and facial hair!
The fact that Rishi Sunak runs around in Pradas doesn't help things. King Charles now has cancelled all future shoe purchases to lower his carbon footprint or some crap like that....
Edit--- just looked it up, Church's has been owned by the Prada group since 1999! Once again, Rishi Sunak knows things the rest of us don't!
Last edited: