• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • Thanks John Elliott!

    Styleforum was one of the first digital communities to embrace John Elliott, and in recognition of that, John Elliott has extended to our comunuty a monthly discount to fans of the brand who engage here. Simply enter the code for SF-OCT-15

    Check out all of their new arrivals here

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Shoe Fit: Brannock Device vs Your real world size.

Shikar

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
3,062
Reaction score
66
After a looong time I got measured at the AE store today on the brannock. L- 10D R- 11D

AE- 11.5D, except Strand in 11D.
Peal- 11.5D
RL- (C&J , EG) 11.5D
EG- 10.5/11 E 202, 11/11.5 D 888, 82
Lobb- 10.5E UK 7000/8000, except William feels way bigger in 10.5E UK.
G&G- 11E UK
Berluti- 11.5D US
AS- 10.5F UK
Alden- 11.5D Plaza, 11.5D in Barrie is way too big.
Suzuki- I wish....:embar:

So it seems the *Device* is no where near my personal comfortable shoe sizes, which i don't wear too snug, I like toe wiggle room. My left foot is smaller as I expected, but a whole size was unexpected. Trying different widths and sizes was great in a real store, but sadly wont carry over to other shoe makers/lasts.

Whats your experience with device vs real world size?

Regards.
 
Last edited:

gsugsu

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
892
Reaction score
117
Similar experience here. According to the Brannock and the people operating it I always cone out at 8.5 D with my left foot slightly bigger than the right. However, based on my subjective sense of comfort I have rarely found a US 8.5 or equivalent to fit.

AE 9D in all lasts that I have tried
EG 82 last 8.5/9E
JL 8E
Vass U last 42.5
Vass F last 42
Barker Black 8E
RM Williams 8
St. Crispin's 8.5F UK equivalent (can't remember the Euro size; 42 I think).

There are no objective signs of my shoes being too big such as abnormal creasing or gaps at the ankle.

Does this have to do with how tight a fit one likes's?
 

PhiPsi32

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
2,664
Reaction score
98
My feet are the same size. Heel to toe on the Brannock, I am an 11C. Heel to ball, I am an 11.5B/C.

AE #5 11.5B
AE #7 11C
Alden Leydon/Hampton/Plaza 11.5B
Alden Barrie/Trubalance 10.5D
Alden Modified 11C
 
Last edited:

Joker Man

Timed Out
Timed Out
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
118
Reaction score
6
Similar experience here. According to the Brannock and the people operating it I always cone out at 8.5 D with my left foot slightly bigger than the right. However, based on my subjective sense of comfort I have rarely found a US 8.5 or equivalent to fit.
AE 9D in all lasts that I have tried
EG 82 last 8.5/9E
JL 8E
Vass U last 42.5
Vass F last 42
Barker Black 8E
RM Williams 8
St. Crispin's 8.5F UK equivalent (can't remember the Euro size; 42 I think).
There are no objective signs of my shoes being too big such as abnormal creasing or gaps at the ankle.
Does this have to do with how tight a fit one likes's?
What is the arch measurement on the brannock? And have you had your feet measured a number of times late in the day?

And you have every brand of shoe that you mentioned above?
 

gsugsu

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
892
Reaction score
117
I've had my feet measured at various times of the day including late in the day. The result is always 8.5D. My left foot is slightly longer than my right but still short of 9. I have a narrow heel and slippage is sometimes a problem. Heel fit is best with a pair of Barker Black Archdale's.. My JL Beckett's are the worst in this respect.
 

Claus

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
246
Reaction score
16
There are a number of reasons for these differences.

First, it's also the fault of the buyer: When one pick a pair of shoes, first, one thereby pre-select the last. Chances are there's almost always a mismatch between foot shape and last shape. That needs to be corrected by selecting different sizes and widths, and, consequently, you'll end up with sizes all over the place.

But Brannock has it's problem, too, in my opinion.

First, for the arch length "feature" to work, the devise needs to assume a fixed ratio between foot length and arch lenght. But why should any shoe maker use the same ratio?

Second, width is relative to the last. A "D" just means the "initial" ball girth of the last, and that can be almost anything. The Barrie last in D is much wider than, say AE's 5-65 last. Brannock cannot account for these differences.

Finally, devise makers such a Brannock appear to use a nominal allowance of 2 full units (UK or US), while most people wear shoes with 1.5 units – at least, according to my data. In other words, even Brannock's length measurement appears to be half a size too long, in general.
 
Last edited:

gsugsu

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
892
Reaction score
117
^ which is why I have never followed the Brannock but rather experimented with which particular last fits best within one maker's range of products and across all makers. As an example, with Vass the F last fits me better than the U even after figuring out my correct size in each respective last.
 

PhiPsi32

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
2,664
Reaction score
98
Anyone else wish to disclose their Brannock size vs. actual shoe size? We can start an ancillary thread for discussion of specific cases.
 

Joker Man

Timed Out
Timed Out
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
118
Reaction score
6
^ which is why I have never followed the Brannock but rather experimented with which particular last fits best within one maker's range of products and across all makers. As an example, with Vass the F last fits me better than the U even after figuring out my correct size in each respective last.
Let's leave out these fringe shoes from Eastern Europe and their sizing. No one wears Vass or cares about their sizing. We talking about US and UK makers and the brannock devices calibrated for each country. You could probably also include a lot of Italian, Spanish etc shoes in the same category because they sell a lot in countries that use the brannock sizing and they make their shoes to correspond to that.
 

Joker Man

Timed Out
Timed Out
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
118
Reaction score
6
There are a number of reasons for these differences.
First, it's also the fault of the buyer: When one pick a pair of shoes, first, one thereby pre-select the last. Chances are there's almost always a mismatch between foot shape and last shape. That needs to be corrected by selecting different sizes and widths, and, consequently, you'll end up with sizes all over the place.
But Brannock has it's problem, too, in my opinion.
First, for the arch length "feature" to work, the devise needs to assume a fixed ratio between foot length and arch lenght. But why should any shoe maker use the same ratio?
Second, width is relative to the last. A "D" just means the "initial" ball girth of the last, and that can be almost anything. The Barrie last in D is much wider than, say AE's 5-65 last. Brannock cannot account for these differences.
Finally, devise makers such a Brannock appear to use a nominal allowance of 2 full units (UK or US), while most people wear shoes with 1.5 units – at least, according to my data. In other words, even Brannock's length measurement appears to be half a size too long, in general.
You're just plain wrong. Width is relative to size not last. But all of this talk is superfluous because 9 out of 10 noobs here can't even get their size and width right.
 

gsugsu

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
892
Reaction score
117
Thanks for the questions and I realize I should have been more clear. Yes, the shoes were all new save for the Barker Black's which were lightly used and purchased from a SF member. Most were purchased in bricks and mortar establishments so I could establish my size for a particular brand and a particular last. Once I have my size pinned down I will order online from an authorized dealer. The Vass U last were purchased new from Vass via a SF member. I suppose i took a flyer on sizing based on reading the Vass thread(s) and asking questions of various members with a great deal of experience with Vass. I've never purchased shoes on EBay.

So yes, I have had my feet measured by professionals numerous times and despite the 8.5D Brannock measurement I feel more comfortable in a 9D US or equivalent. Maybe I am wrong basing my choices on my subjective feelings of how the shoes fit but I have to wear them and I have no regrets.
 

Claus

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
246
Reaction score
16

Maybe I am wrong basing my choices on my subjective feelings of how the shoes fit but I have to wear them and I have no regrets.


Your choice may not be purely based on subjective feelings about shoe fit.

It's very common for men with an absolute small foot length to have above-average width and girth measurements, ie. a relatively wider and higher foot shape. At least, according to my data.

Since most lasts are not made for such foot shapes (or they are unknown to buyers), such people tend to size up from their reference size. I have the same, well, "problem".

Strictly speaking, though, your shoes are probably 1/3 inch (about 8.5mm) longer than recommended, provided your Brannock size is based on foot length.
 
Last edited:

rs232

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Messages
241
Reaction score
19
^But only provided that the lasts he chooses are of the same proportion as his feet.

350x263px-LL-de48734f_900x900px-LL-09c5525b_P5312698.jpeg


Consider the large number of sizing issues on the Vass U last, and the various rules of thumb of sizing up and down on that last (darker tree above, lighter is EG888). These largely stem from the high, forward positioning of the instep, and the low volume, narrow toe box - i.e. you need a high arch and small toes to fit it well. Most people don't have this combination, so they size up if they have a high arch and large toes, or down if they have a lower arch and small toes (this would be me: normal arch, small toes, US9B on the Brannock, 41 on the U last). Those with normal or low arches and large toes or wide feet have experienced much disappointment because of this.
 
Last edited:

Featured Sponsor

How Do You Feel About Pleated Trousers?

  • Love them, classic!

  • Occasionally, depending on the outfit

  • Prefer flat-front

  • Never wear them


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
516,517
Messages
10,690,816
Members
227,440
Latest member
clovereddog
Top