King Calder
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2013
- Messages
- 2,235
- Reaction score
- 4,875
Cathy is in open warfare against the industry
This is the crux, right? She's probably the most vocal critic of an industry that has otherwise gone unnoticed and unscrutinized for most of its existence. No one likes being criticized, especially when they've been very profitable while doing whatever they want.
Shah asked:
are you suggesting that data scientists are opposed to transparency?
and I would say that most data scientists aren't opposed to it as many just don't even care about it, or hadn't thought about it before, and find making it a priority cumbersome. Of those who do, many have bosses who don't. Cathy values equality, transparency, and justice and those define her perspective, just as her critics have other values that informs their perspective. Yeah Cathy probably thinks her opponents are morally corrupt, and while you could say that she's over-exuberant about it she is right in that it is not merely a technical disagreement but a moral one. Take a company like Faception:
Regardless of how you want to define "data scientists", numerical literacy doesn't help if there's divergent opinions that using facial recognition to profile people is wrong. An analogy would be that while we can argue about what nuclear detonators work best, and how to classify the engineers on the teams that build them, the larger question is whether we should have nukes at all.