dmass1
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2009
- Messages
- 247
- Reaction score
- 1
+1.
I was at a tailor once for a minor alteration and some dude was getting some slacks hemmed. So he is standing on the box in front of the mirror, barefoot, and the tailor just marks a spot with chalk and the guy says...ok.....didn't factor in the fact that he has no shoes/how high or low he wears his pants/etc. IMO, it's up to the customer to specify exactly what they want.....
Yea - I should have been more specific I guess, but if you're comparing my situation to trying on pants without shoes thats a pretty big reach. I had him measure the shirts and pin them to the length I wanted. Like I said, I figured he would hem them the same as the test shirt as thats the whole point of the "prototype" test shirt.
It is possible. I don't know where you are coming up with these arbitrary restrictions.
They're not arbitrary restrictions. I have never heard of anyone hemming a shirt and then returning to the manufacturer when the shirt doesn't come out the way they had hoped. I get that BrooksBrothers is a huge chain and can afford to refund its customers, but did not imagine they would refund an altered shirt. Have you actually done this?
I believe you could get away using the shirt both tucked and not tucked if the rise is sufficient. I like the rise at a point high enough so the length is enough to stay tucked in while still looking good with jeans without a tuck.
Unfortunately I wear APC NS jeans and even for my work pants (mainly chinos and wool trousers) I would not consider the rise very high.