• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

Academic2

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
2,946
Reaction score
4,276
The simple solution to the "slightly tight jacket, with a somewhat high buttoning point" would be to wear the jacket unbuttoned when worn as part of a three-piece. I almost always wear my three-pieces with the jacket unbuttoned. Otherwise people wouldn't get to view the waistcoat in all it's glory
wink.gif

Yes. And this is what I almost always do. I buttoned it here since it was my first time posting a photo, and I didn't want it to look like I was trying to hide anything.

My own rule of thumb regarding the relation between the jacket and vest is that at least one and no more than two buttons of the latter should show when the former is buttoned. The Platonic ideal for me: just one button of the vest will show, and on a two-button jacket that button is precisely as far above the top button of the jacket as the top button of the jacket is above the bottom button of the jacket. If two show, the equal-spacing principle would still apply.

The three-piece can look great on men of all body types: big, small, fat, skinny. But that doesn't mean getting the proportions right is easy.

Regarding seeing the vest when the jacket is buttoned, as you know there are a lot of suits these days where you can't see even the top button of the vest if the jacket is buttoned. And I'm not talking about department store brands. Suit Supply, Charles Tyrwhitt, et al.

Honestly, I don't know what those people are thinking.

Cheers,

Ac
 
Last edited:

Academic2

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
2,946
Reaction score
4,276
Thanks,

I am taking a long hard look at my jackets and making sure the button stance isn't too high. That photo helps give me some reference.

eek.gif


So you’re announcing that henceforth you are using me as an object lesson?

Hmmm.

Be careful, lad. I’m thin, but I'm tough.

Cheers,

Ac
 

TweedyProf

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
4,653
Reaction score
3,456
@anathor
Not to derail the contributions of others! But since I posted about button stance in the tailor's thread a week ago, here's a link that you might helpful. The experts in this thread can ignore or use it to show others:

http://www.styleforum.net/t/265924/...-and-alteration-suggestions/4290#post_6868595

(I actually think it is post 4304).

You'll see a pic of my jacket which has too high of a button stance and a redrawn pic of a lower stance by one of the tailors showing where I wanted the button placed, but didn't adequately communicate this to the company. I wasn't going to complain since this was a remake of a jacket (MTM). I can correct in the next one. It otherwise is a nice clean jacket: I would just lower the stance and also lengthen a bit.

The nice thing is the side by side pic which I thought strikingly illustrates why a lower button stance looks better. But judge for yourself.
 

Silhouette

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
134
Reaction score
3
I'm all about the simple bare excessities.

Seriously, poor form to pick at someone's small error in their second language (how many of us write in a forum in a language that's not our own, and flawlessly?), but actually I'm delighted by the accidental invention of this word. "Excessities" is really what SF is all about: what we consider to be "simple", "getting the basics right" and indeed, "classic and timeless" - the mere baseline, that even in most formal office environments would be considered a vain excess: our "real ancient madders", carefully-selected merino suitcloth, our obsessively-sourced welted shoes and our care in choice of tailor, gorge and buttoning point. Vain, obsessive, extravagant and irrelevant to the many, and yet somehow vital to the few.

These are our excessities. Brilliant word, well done.

My presence is gonna start, like, a frigging coup d'etat on this *****.
lol8[1].gif
ffffuuuu.gif


I'm sorry that I abused the English language with a a word which doesn't exist. Excess and abundance incapsulate huge beards better.

My whole-hearted respect for you though mimo, I've read nothing but interesting posts from you.
 
Last edited:

TweedyProf

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
4,653
Reaction score
3,456
Not personally (Irish people, especially *Dublin* Irish people, don't really wear them), but they would be one of the more well known makers of those sweaters and would be of very high quality. Aran sweaters especially.
What is the Irish "Irish" sweater then?
 

Academic2

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
2,946
Reaction score
4,276
Today. I got this tie about a month ago (PRL grenadine). I've had a pretty hard time working it into an outfit.

[...]


Perhaps it’s my monitor, but it’s a little hard to see the tie with a shirt that dark.

The pocket square, on the other hand, pops out quite nicely given its contrast with the jacket, and indeed is one of the first things to catch the eye. It might be nice if the tie and the shirt exhibited the same degree of contrast, so the viewer’s eye is directed toward, not away from your face.

*** grano salis, of course. Could be the photo, could be my monitor, or I could be crazy.

Cheers,

Ac
 

An Acute Style

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
7,742
Reaction score
56,863
Perhaps it’s my monitor, but it’s a little hard to see the tie with a shirt that dark.

The pocket square, on the other hand, pops out quite nicely given its contrast with the jacket, and indeed is one of the first things to catch the eye. It might be nice if the tie and the shirt exhibited the same degree of contrast, so the viewer’s eye is directed toward, not away from your face.

*** grano salis, of course. Could be the photo, could be my monitor, or I could be crazy.

Cheers,

Ac

The top is a bit dark. The pants are very very bright so I think it exaggerates the lack of contrast on top. I think a lighter shirt would have been better. Best.
 

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106
Dome good lookd today toomany words in drunk sup hemrelmena!!!
 

Claghorn

Stylish Dinosaur
Dubiously Honored
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
31,946

DerekS

Guyliner
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,338
Reaction score
4,743
Howdy folks. Been awhile.
1000
 

DerekS

Guyliner
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,338
Reaction score
4,743
Status
Not open for further replies.

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 100 36.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 98 36.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 34 12.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 44 16.2%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 41 15.1%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,658
Messages
10,597,592
Members
224,487
Latest member
amm abde
Top