g transistor
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2009
- Messages
- 6,577
- Reaction score
- 12,741
Yeah, I was hoping it'd be ~$160ish. Hopefully the Floral Tab is around there.
Thanks John Elliott!
Styleforum was one of the first digital communities to embrace John Elliott, and in recognition of that, John Elliott has extended to our comunuty a monthly discount to fans of the brand who engage here. Simply enter the code for SF-OCT-15
Check out all of their new arrivals here
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
The 19th Century BD are always around $250 so this doesn't surprise me.
The 19th Century BD (long sleeve) versions are Single Needle, which increases the cost. I don't recall if the short sleeve versions (popover or camp shirt?) are Single Needle too, but if not then that could be the dramatic difference in price. The $275 sticker price is also normal for the 19th Century BD. The stitching pattern for the tuille is even more work put into the piece.
True but they've been doing Single needle tailored shirts for less before.
FW10's Single Needle 19th Century BD's were around the same price, if not slightly more expensive depending where you got them (Bloomie's had them at $290 IIRC). Maybe a year or two ago they were $250, but with labor and material costs increasing this price isn't surprising.
Do you guys recommend sizing down for the cream polka dot work shirt this season? I did not purchase any work shirts last season but I am typically a medium with a 40 chest. Context's measurements have the p2p measurement of a medium at 21.5. Thanks
Wow! Yeah, I suppose I would based on those measurements. I'm usually a S, but I'd have to go with an XS in that shirt. I wonder why they cut them so much fuller.