MoneyWellSpent
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Messages
- 2,697
- Reaction score
- 1,178
^^^ Isn't JM Weston still using a full leather insole with leather holdfast on some models? I think they are more or less then only ones doing it still (wasn't that uncommon in the early years of Goodyear welting if I'm correctly informed). Might be done in a different way than what G&G tried to do though.
@Handmadeshoes I think that the 890 looks better than 888 (I like to call 888 Tony's failed version of MH71), and sounds reasonable that they want something "own". All good for me if they exchange 888 for 890, just need to try the 890 in F-width and see how it fits me.
i think so yes but that is just hearsay from what others have told me....nothing concrete
So are they handwelting or or using machines?
Do the lines of JM Westons seem coarse to your eye? Just curious...
JM Weston still employs the original Goodyear-welting method on some of their models as shown in this video (Not JM Weston's):
This is how Goodyear-welting was originally done, by cutting and turning a thin leather holdfast, and reinforcing it with a sheet of canvas. I'm sure the insoles were slightly thicker than modern GY-welted shoes, since they had to have enough to cut and turn, but they were obviously not as thick as a hand-welted insole.
Gemming as we know it today didn't come along until sometime around the 2nd World War.
They also employ modern gemming on some models.
Here is a photo that is from JM Weston, showing the original (old) GY-welting insoles:
The reinforcement role of the canvas is evidenced here as well, just in case you didn't watch the video.
Last edited: