- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Messages
- 4,465
- Reaction score
- 18,339
Quite probably. As I understand it, Brand A contracts "security" company Z to "protect" their brand. They employee people and algorithms to seek things that they don't like and invoke VeRO. eBay trusts the brand and pulls the listing until you can sufficiently "prove" provenance.
I'm completely against fakes, especially when they're being sold as the real deal. VeRO was created to both fight counterfeit merchandise and appease the brands. Some use it appropriately and limit the junk that is posted. Others, and this is the problem, use it to remove anything that they don't like. It may be because of price-points or their viewpoint that it cheapens their name, but too often it violates the right of second sale.
Are these the same people that gave @Fueco
**** about Velcro?
Quite probably. As I understand it, Brand A contracts "security" company Z to "protect" their brand. They employee people and algorithms to seek things that they don't like and invoke VeRO. eBay trusts the brand and pulls the listing until you can sufficiently "prove" provenance.
I'm completely against fakes, especially when they're being sold as the real deal. VeRO was created to both fight counterfeit merchandise and appease the brands. Some use it appropriately and limit the junk that is posted. Others, and this is the problem, use it to remove anything that they don't like. It may be because of price-points or their viewpoint that it cheapens their name, but too often it violates the right of second sale.