mimo
Pernicious Enabler
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2012
- Messages
- 7,725
- Reaction score
- 5,256
I have no statistical information to back up my prejudice. My view, based purely on forum anecdote and the like, is that Sea-Gull and BWC movements are not as good as even cheap Japanese movements. They are both made in the tens of millions, and often in the same country, but the Japanese companies' quality control and industrial standards are superior. Therefore, a Sea-Gull movement is less trustworthy than the cheapest Seiko or Miyota movement. When you combine massive numbers with tiny margins and weak controls, you get lower quality. Add in more complications, and the problem gets worse. Therefore, I would expect a Sea-Gull chrono to not only be less well-made than a Seiko, but less reliable also than a simple time-only Sea-Gull.
But, don't let me compromise my status as Chief Enabling Officer. *******, it's really pretty and it's less than half a grand, you'll at least get a year's warranty from the maker I would have thought, and any life beyond that is probably a bonus considering what else you'll probably buy this year. So I'm not exactly saying "don't buy it". Maybe I am saying that for even less, you could buy the actual retro-vintage-re-make Sea-Gull chronograph, and if that falls to bits next year, it matters even less. But each to his own. Kop on, my friend!
But, don't let me compromise my status as Chief Enabling Officer. *******, it's really pretty and it's less than half a grand, you'll at least get a year's warranty from the maker I would have thought, and any life beyond that is probably a bonus considering what else you'll probably buy this year. So I'm not exactly saying "don't buy it". Maybe I am saying that for even less, you could buy the actual retro-vintage-re-make Sea-Gull chronograph, and if that falls to bits next year, it matters even less. But each to his own. Kop on, my friend!