• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The State of Black Tie: Your Observations

palk

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
149
Reaction score
67
I do not understand why 2 eyelet Derbys like the Forsythes shown in the G&G page and similar plain fronted shoes are less popular for use with DJ.

I have just picked up a pair of G&G Hastings and to me a pair in highly polished black would look great as evening shoes.

I personally avoid them because of my high instep which causes unsightly creases near the vamp point; oxfords (not wholecuts) and pumps are much better for me in that regard.
 

Winot

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
589
Reaction score
564
I do not understand why 2 eyelet Derbys like the Forsythes shown in the G&G page and similar plain fronted shoes are less popular for use with DJ.

I have just picked up a pair of G&G Hastings and to me a pair in highly polished black would look great as evening shoes.

I guess because traditionally Derbys are meant to be less formal than Oxfords.
 

palk

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
149
Reaction score
67
I guess because traditionally Derbys are meant to be less formal than Oxfords.

My 2c: I wouldn't say that they are "meant" to be less formal, but rather that they tend to be less formal. The two-eyelet derbys will likely be indistinguishable from oxfords (and therefore just as formal), as the lacings are so high up that they will be completely covered by the trousers. Generally speaking, if the lacings were not fully covered by the trousers (e.g., extended further down the vamp), the inherent untidiness of the exposed open lacings might be slightly less than ideal to some.
 

Andy57

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
4,876
Reaction score
16,186
I've just ordered my first bespoke dinner suit (from Meyer & Mortimer, who make most of my work suits).

Style:
- jacket has side vents, heavy ribbed grosgrain facing on lapels and on jetted pockets

Anything I've missed?
Yes. Delete the side vents.
 

archibaldleach

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
5,387
Reaction score
2,369
I’m curious as to how the “no vents” in black tie standards came about and what the rational for the distinction from standard suit venting rules is...

The short version is that ventless is more traditional and that tradition and quasi-uniform is more important in black tie than most other dress codes we encounter. Ventless jackets can also be a bit more slimming, and with fewer moving pieces, more minimalist, which fits nicely into the spirit of black tie, where you are mostly dressing in only two colors and allowing focus to be on things other than your attire.
 

archibaldleach

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
5,387
Reaction score
2,369
Personally, I'd put side vents in the venial sin category. A center vent is of course an abomination that should result in immediate excommunication from the society of people who attend black tie events. I like the ventless option for the sake of tradition, because it is a bit more slimming, and also because, as someone who gets pretty much everything with side vents, it's nice to have some minor points of differentiation between my dinner jacket and my regular suits (in my case, shawl lapel, one button (versus 2), and a ventless jacket).
 

Mark from Plano

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
11,061
Reaction score
1,481
Personally, I'd put side vents in the venial sin category.

I was about to jump on and make this same point. I’m recently put in specs for a new black tie rig and the one departure from the true faith that I permitted myself was side vents. I feel it adds an element of comfort without seriously departing from orthodoxy.

My tailor (who shall for this purpose remain nameless) said that he put them on his dinner jacket as well. So if I am wrong at least I’ll have someone to tailor my clothing in sartorial hell.
 

lordsuperb

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
9,042
Reaction score
12,673
The short version is that ventless is more traditional and that tradition and quasi-uniform is more important in black tie than most other dress codes we encounter. Ventless jackets can also be a bit more slimming, and with fewer moving pieces, more minimalist, which fits nicely into the spirit of black tie, where you are mostly dressing in only two colors and allowing focus to be on things other than your attire.

giphy.gif
 

Winot

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
589
Reaction score
564
I was about to jump on and make this same point. I’m recently put in specs for a new black tie rig and the one departure from the true faith that I permitted myself was side vents. I feel it adds an element of comfort without seriously departing from orthodoxy.

My tailor (who shall for this purpose remain nameless) said that he put them on his dinner jacket as well. So if I am wrong at least I’ll have someone to tailor my clothing in sartorial hell.

Yeah I had pretty much the same discussion with mine.
 

classicalthunde

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
2,725
Reaction score
2,458
Personally, I'd put side vents in the venial sin category. A center vent is of course an abomination that should result in immediate excommunication from the society of people who attend black tie events. I like the ventless option for the sake of tradition, because it is a bit more slimming, and also because, as someone who gets pretty much everything with side vents, it's nice to have some minor points of differentiation between my dinner jacket and my regular suits (in my case, shawl lapel, one button (versus 2), and a ventless jacket).

Yea, I get the traditional aspect, and can appreciate that it is less complex and therefore more formal (a la black cap toes vs brogues)...it just seems arbitrary that 1 vent is less formal than 2 vents, which is less formal than no vents
 

Faux Brummell

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
219
Reaction score
301
Here is the reasoning behind it (from The Black Tie Guide):

The original dinner jackets were made without vents then later offered with side vents. While side vents provide easier access to trouser pockets and are more comfortable to sit in, they can also make the jacket less slimming and somewhat compromise the intended formality of the tuxedo.
The center (aka single) vent is unacceptable not only because of its sporty pedigree (it is a horseback adaptation much less refined than the tailcoat's) but also because it opens up when a man reaches into his trouser pockets thus exposing the seat of his pants and often a white patch of shirt to boot. Despite its inappropriateness, the single vent is becoming more common on dinner jackets as mainstream manufacturers save money by patterning their tuxedos on standard suit styles. Fortunately, a good tailor can convert these jackets into ventless models by closing the vent


Yea, I get the traditional aspect, and can appreciate that it is less complex and therefore more formal (a la black cap toes vs brogues)...it just seems arbitrary that 1 vent is less formal than 2 vents, which is less formal than no vents
 

Andy57

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
4,876
Reaction score
16,186
+1 for side vents for the comfort (particularly being able to sit down in comfort with a double breasted jacket fastened) and pocket access reasons.
I don’t get this comfort thing. None of my dinner jackets have vents. As far as comfort goes, they are no different than my suit jackets, which all have side vents.
 

archibaldleach

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
5,387
Reaction score
2,369
I don’t get this comfort thing. None of my dinner jackets have vents. As far as comfort goes, they are no different than my suit jackets, which all have side vents.

Indeed. Comfort is often a state of mind rather than anything physical. I won't claim that's true for everyone, but if someone thinks "ventless = uncomfortable," that may be enough. Of course, this could all be a reaction to an uncomfortable rental tux that happened to be ventless, where the problem lies with the rental tux and not it being ventless. If one's clothes fit, they shouldn't be uncomfortable.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 101 36.9%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 99 36.1%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 34 12.4%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 44 16.1%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 41 15.0%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,735
Messages
10,597,976
Members
224,497
Latest member
Bonaccorso
Top