- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 26,729
- Reaction score
- 9,877
God. I am not saying, "assuming," or expressing in anyway that a mistake is embarrassing. It was a statement about what OTHERS should believe, at the worst, about me--in contrast to their belief that I am somehow aggrandizing myself by retracting an endorsement. Your English is not doing you any service and your arrogance is manifesting in your insistence on arguing on this point, despite your handicap in understanding what is being discussed.
This is a blatant falsehood. The quality of a thing is not exclusively defined by what it feels like. If it were, we would have no need of knowing what fibers any material is made of. Why mention if something is cashmere, wool, silk, etc.? Just feel it!
My opinion is that you are a pest. You have barely 200 posts on this forum, and already you cannot get in a discussion with me without commenting on character and motivations.
I will delete all your future posts in this thread.
I did not state that you said that. You stated (the quote is bellow) that assuming a mistake is an embarrassment and, to that, I replied that this view would only perpetuate your character flaw (arrogance), which is evidenced by your participation on this forum. Point, no more, no less.
God. I am not saying, "assuming," or expressing in anyway that a mistake is embarrassing. It was a statement about what OTHERS should believe, at the worst, about me--in contrast to their belief that I am somehow aggrandizing myself by retracting an endorsement. Your English is not doing you any service and your arrogance is manifesting in your insistence on arguing on this point, despite your handicap in understanding what is being discussed.
If your understanding about it changed, you changed. Common, I sure that you can keep up to this.
My point is that you had the stuff on your hands and you still saw potential on it, but, after acknowledging that it has polyester on it, now you see it as crap. It still feels the same, it still has the same properties.
This is a blatant falsehood. The quality of a thing is not exclusively defined by what it feels like. If it were, we would have no need of knowing what fibers any material is made of. Why mention if something is cashmere, wool, silk, etc.? Just feel it!
So, your first judgment was based on what? In my opinion, mainstream opinion.
My opinion is that you are a pest. You have barely 200 posts on this forum, and already you cannot get in a discussion with me without commenting on character and motivations.
I will delete all your future posts in this thread.
Last edited: