• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

MTM Suit Critique

Macallan9

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
758
Reaction score
5
Im about to place another order but would like help from the forum in nitpicking all the little details that could be improved.

IMG_2699.jpg

IMG_2700.jpg

IMG_2710.jpg


Some thoughts and questions:

1. Sleeves will need to be shortened to show cuff
2. I asked the tailor for very very little padding, and he said he made it as light as possible but it would not sit well if he took off any more. Has anyone heard this before? Any truth to it?
3. The back of the pants look terrible. SW&D posters are probably admiring the honeycombing. How can this be fixed?

No mercy, please. No detail too insignificant.
 

kuwisdelu

Senior Member
Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
541
Reaction score
2
Looks like you have a donut in your left back pocket. No idea how to fix it, though.

But yeah, lengthen the jacket about 1 - 2 inches, and shorten the sleeves by the same.

Shoulders look okay to me.

Your left sleeve looks good, but the pitch on the right one looks off. Are you holding both arms at the same angle and how you naturally let them hang?
 

Sanguis Mortuum

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
5,024
Reaction score
141
It need to be at least an inch longer.


(...must resist making comment about you having heard that phrase before...)
 

RUSSBHEEZ

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Overall fit is off, jacket length being the most obvious(jacket seems to be also bunching in the front). Tailor may be able to correct.
 

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,713
Reaction score
9,858
Originally Posted by Macallan9
1. Sleeves will need to be shortened to show cuff
2. I asked the tailor for very very little padding, and he said he made it as light as possible but it would not sit well if he took off any more. Has anyone heard this before? Any truth to it?
3. The back of the pants look terrible. SW&D posters are probably admiring the honeycombing. How can this be fixed?


In response to #2: yes. Not every maker is used to making a softer jacket. If his equipment, staff, and patterns are geared toward stiffer construction, there's only so much that can be changed. If you swapped out the guts of a hard jacket for a soft jacket, but retained the hard jacket's original shell, you'd get a messed up looking jacket (lots of excess fabric, bunching, and unattractive draping).

In response to #3: the pants look way too tight across your ass. It's not pleasant. If you increase the meaurement across you rear, the pants won't grip so tightly there, and will drape much more cleanly.

I would also lengthen the jacket. There is arguably a range for acceptable jacket length, but this is clearly outside that range: way too much of your rear-end is visible. The waist suppression is too severe: you can tell by lookin at the diagonal pulling from the buttoning point and the skin-tight fit across your lower back.

Perhaps re-think how soft you've asked them to make the shoulders. The strong convex curvature that abruptly ends at the collar is very inelegant. It would be better to have a more built-up shoulder and a less unnaturally convex shoulder line.
 

mimile

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
236
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by mafoofan
In response to #2: yes. Not every maker is used to making a softer jacket. If his equipment, staff, and patterns are geared toward stiffer construction, there's only so much that can be changed. If you swapped out the guts of a hard jacket for a soft jacket, but retained the hard jacket's original shell, you'd get a messed up looking jacket (lots of excess fabric, bunching, and unattractive draping).

In response to #3: the pants look way too tight across your ass. It's not pleasant. If you increase the meaurement across you rear, the pants won't grip so tightly there, and will drape much more cleanly.

I would also lengthen the jacket. There is arguably a range for acceptable jacket length, but this is clearly outside that range: way too much of your rear-end is visible. The waist suppression is too severe: you can tell by lookin at the diagonal pulling from the buttoning point and the skin-tight fit across your lower back.

Perhaps re-think how soft you've asked them to make the shoulders. The strong convex curvature that abruptly ends at the collar is very inelegant. It would be better to have a more built-up shoulder and a less unnaturally convex shoulder line.


+1 to what Mafoo answered. Also reconsider sleeve length. Shorten them at least 3-4 cm.
 

Bellum

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
232
Reaction score
1
No mercy? Frankly this is example 20981 on styleforum of bad MTM. If you had gone RTW it would at least be wearable. This forum needs a public service announcement regarding MTM.
 

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,713
Reaction score
9,858
Originally Posted by Bellum
No mercy? Frankly this is example 20981 on styleforum of bad MTM. If you had gone RTW it would at least be wearable. This forum needs a public service announcement regarding MTM.

I don't think MTM itself is the problem. Ninety percent of the time we see disastrous MTM here it's because it was done remote or because the customer used the opportunity to play designer. You can't have an online MTM shop shorten a jacket by five inches and get Thom Browne out of it.
 

Bellum

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
232
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by mafoofan
I don't think MTM itself is the problem. Ninety percent of the time we see disastrous MTM here it's because it was done remote or because the customer used to opportunity to play designer. You can't have an online MTM shop shorten a jacket by five inches and get Thom Browne out of it.

That goes without saying. MTM allows for poor decisions and the danger of having a little bit of knowledge.
 

Macallan9

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
758
Reaction score
5
Originally Posted by RUSSBHEEZ
Overall fit is off, jacket length being the most obvious(jacket seems to be also bunching in the front). Tailor may be able to correct.

"Fit is off" is rather vague, and "Tailor may be able to correct" is even less useful if I cant give him direction, no?

Originally Posted by mafoofan
In response to #2: yes. Not every maker is used to making a softer jacket. If his equipment, staff, and patterns are geared toward stiffer construction, there's only so much that can be changed. If you swapped out the guts of a hard jacket for a soft jacket, but retained the hard jacket's original shell, you'd get a messed up looking jacket (lots of excess fabric, bunching, and unattractive draping).

In response to #3: the pants look way too tight across your ass. It's not pleasant. If you increase the meaurement across you rear, the pants won't grip so tightly there, and will drape much more cleanly.

I would also lengthen the jacket. There is arguably a range for acceptable jacket length, but this is clearly outside that range: way too much of your rear-end is visible. The waist suppression is too severe: you can tell by lookin at the diagonal pulling from the buttoning point and the skin-tight fit across your lower back.

Perhaps re-think how soft you've asked them to make the shoulders. The strong convex curvature that abruptly ends at the collar is very inelegant. It would be better to have a more built-up shoulder and a less unnaturally convex shoulder line.


Thanks, mafoo. Exactly what I needed.

Originally Posted by Bellum
No mercy? Frankly this is example 20981 on styleforum of bad MTM. If you had gone RTW it would at least be wearable. This forum needs a public service announcement regarding MTM.

This is a first attempt MTM. Ill correct from here, the second will be better, the third closer to perfect. What would be the point of always having "wearable"? I'd like perfect. You don't seem to grasp that when someone posts a MTM, it's going to be bad because of human error. The people with well done MTMs dont need input anymore.

Originally Posted by mikej77
Clean your room.

Im in the process of moving, but thanks for your input.
 

bowtielover

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
5
The bosy of the jacket is way too short, everything else looks good but you either need a long instead of a regualr or a regular instead of a short. You want the tips of your fingers to touch or come close to the bottom of the jacket.
 

Douglas

Stupid ass member
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
14,243
Reaction score
2,166
Waist seems overly suppressed. Looks a little too form-fitting from the back, and pulls in front.

As others have noted, obviously the jacket is very short. Strangely, it looks shorter in back than in front.

Yes, pants are a disaster, but I don't know what to do about them.

As you noted, sleeves are too long.

Blades are strange - might be a result of you asking to remove a lot of padding, but still they ought to be able to do better than this, I would think.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 101 36.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 100 36.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 36 12.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 46 16.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 41 14.7%

Forum statistics

Threads
508,012
Messages
10,598,853
Members
224,521
Latest member
Jack345
Top