WorldWideWafflz
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2013
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 32
Yes, you can have no or almost no break and still have narrow leg openings. Otherwise you'll show socks standing up.
LuxeSwap Auctions will be ending soon!
LuxeSwap is the original consignor for Styleforum, and has weekly auctions that show the diversity of our community, with hundreds lof starting at $0.99 every week, ending starting at 5:30 Eastern Time. Please take the time to check them out here. You may find something that fits your wardrobe exactly
Good luck!.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
^Wow, those look wonderful. I need to go back!
Quote:Have you figured out how to do slanted cuffs? I haven't. Would love to see drawings.I can make some drawings :>
Quote:
I'm pretty sure Despos has a niftier way that involves heating, stretching and pressing fabric but this definitely worked when I folded paper :O
For this folding technique all we need is the front and back length f and b respectively, the height of the cuff and the angle.
So if we assume a leg opening of 20cm, equal front and back length of 10cm and an offset of half an inch, i.e. 12.7mm we get can calculate the angle α:
α=(arctan(12.7mm/200mm))*180/pi => α = 3.63340364° ~ 4°
For a 50mm cuff it would look like this:
On second thought a faux cuff might be 20 times easier.
I'm pretty sure Despos has a niftier way that involves heating, stretching and pressing fabric but this definitely worked when I folded paper :O
For this folding technique all we need is the front and back length f and b respectively, the height of the cuff and the angle.
So if we assume a leg opening of 20cm, equal front and back length of 10cm and an offset of half an inch, i.e. 12.7mm we get can calculate the angle α:
α=(arctan(12.7mm/200mm))*180/pi => α = 3.63340364° ~ 4°
For a 50mm cuff it would look like this:
On second thought a faux cuff might be 20 times easier.
This is an unusual and incredible way of angling a cuffed hem. When I've done this to my own trousers, I relied mostly on aggressive stretching and heating. I want to try this approach on fabric now...I'm pretty sure Despos has a niftier way that involves heating, stretching and pressing fabric but this definitely worked when I folded paper :O
For this folding technique all we need is the front and back length f and b respectively, the height of the cuff and the angle.
So if we assume a leg opening of 20cm, equal front and back length of 10cm and an offset of half an inch, i.e. 12.7mm we get can calculate the angle α:
α=(arctan(12.7mm/200mm))*180/pi => α = 3.63340364° ~ 4°
For a 50mm cuff it would look like this:
On second thought a faux cuff might be 20 times easier.
Deets on the left two?
Wow, interesting work, Clapy. Would the cut fabric be visible (on the outside or inside) when everything's stitched together?
The entire necessary additional trouser length for a cuff of the height h and angle α would come down to 3*h + f*tan(α) and 3*h + 2*b*tan(α).
Every time I come across some good green oxford, I think of you and google Miles Davis Green to compare the color, has been elusive so far.
We could get it overdyed, but, that would sadly end the search.
What is the appeal of a military hem? Less break while still covering your socks from the back?
+1@Luxire, would it be feasible for you to manufacture leather gloves as well? Any estimate of cost?