threeleggeddog
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Messages
- 435
- Reaction score
- 205
To be honest, I don’t think thickness of titanium really has much to do with durability. I can imagine thick titanium snapping just as easily as I can imagine lightweight titanium snapping. Quality is likely more important than thickness. And with that, I actually think jmm modern titanium frames are better quality than their acetate counterparts, which are starting to feel almost mass produced whereas the titanium feels substantial, even if they are light.I was concerned about that before picking up Jaggers and 1962s. What I like about them is the fit and that they’re super light. I think they can hold up if you use them as dailies, but you definitely want to take care in how you handle them, like not grabbing them from one temple side when taking them off or tossing them around. They certainly don’t feel substantial from a weight or thickness perspective, but they don’t feel cheap or flimsy. Unless you equate lightweight with flimsy. I have Dita metal aviators that are relatively thick and sturdy. I wouldn’t say they’re better made than the JMMs.
There are brands that are far cheaper with titanium and also feel nice however. Native sons - recently got a pair of their frames for 50% and feel extremely well made and weigh nothing. (See pic). Really liking this brand…
I think Akoni shares a manufacturer with Dita (although they feel higher quality for whatever reason) - I think dita has solid titanium frames but the acetate feels a bit cheaper for whatever reason. That said, their acetate is also far lighter and more comfortable, so this could be a smarter design choice as I doubt either will be breaking from ordinary wear.
All things considered as it comes to price of titanium frames, dita, akoni, and jmm are all hovering around $1000+ for models at the moment. I think all of them are likely going to outlast the wear we would likely give them at this price point… but it is a high price point.