rjc149
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2016
- Messages
- 913
- Reaction score
- 692
Not fretting, just looking down my nose at them.If you have no concerns about your own manliness why fret about other men?
Unless the t-shirt graphic depicts cars, guns, a sports team (except soccer), a t-shirt costing more than $50 is for girls.You said $50 T-shirts originally. Don’t move the goalposts now. honestly I think there are some $50-75 T-shirts that do feel nicer and better made than $15 T-shirts. Whether you value such differences is up to you, but they do exist.
Seriously though, when it comes to menswear, and stuff in general, there are things which warrant the higher expense, and things that don't.
High-earning women in say, corporate settings, tend to be dominant, assertive personalities which are traditionally associated with masculinity. The masculine/feminine dichotomy correlating with dominance/submission and with provider/nurturer is as old as mammalian life itself.And what if a woman makes lots of money? Is that manly? Or what would you call that?
You can always make your gender role arguments from a vacuum and disregard social/biological context as some sort of patriarchal construct, but that context will never remove itself from this discourse because it is rooted in human biology.
Why Aren’t More CEOs Women?
New study shows that women are not advancing to the C-Suite in large numbers.
www.forbes.com
I always thought this was an interesting study on why there aren't more women CEO's -- yes, because of gender discrimination, for sure. But also, because ambition, and attaining wealth and power, tend to be more "male" goals; whereas women often prioritize their personal lives and family relationships over professional achievement -- especially at the point in life where people become CEO's. This article surmises that there aren't more women CEO's because women don't want to be CEO's.