• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • LuxeSwap Auctions will be ending soon!

    LuxeSwap is the original consignor for Styleforum, and has weekly auctions that show the diversity of our community, with hundreds lof starting at $0.99 every week, ending starting at 5:30 Eastern Time. Please take the time to check them out here. You may find something that fits your wardrobe exactly

    Good luck!

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

٭٭٭ No Man Walks Alone - Official Affiliate Thread ٭٭٭ (a.k.a. I shouldn't have slept on it)

Balman

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2023
Messages
15
Reaction score
11
I tend to trust that the makers I trust are better able to select textiles than I am and that the inclusion of synthetics is a conscious choice with a specific goal rather than a compromise. At least, it should be for the prices.
But that's just it, the transition from a smaller less profitable, to a larger more profitable market is usually gradual with more and more cost cutting added with time. Materials are no exception when it comes to that sadly. How would we know if it was done for improvement rather than compromise?

I see no reason why makers would ever omit a material specification, like in this case for lining, if they didn't believe it will be received negatively by the consumer.
 
Last edited:

trafficjam

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Messages
602
Reaction score
873
For what it's worth, Mr. Porter lists the lining as viscose, so you're safe. That said, I think your suspicion is generally misplaced given the variety of qualities of all kinds of materials. How would you know ANY material was done for improvement or compromise? It's a trivial question and we get to place our faiths in Greg 'n' co, Valstar, and our senses to be a proxy. Really doubt that the NMWA folks were like, "sure we stock a lot of good stuff, but let's grab one piece that's dogshit. As a joke, for the customer to find out."
 

gdl203

Purveyor of the Secret Sauce
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
45,648
Reaction score
54,523
Synthetic blends are a deal-breaker for me. Always have been apart from athletic wear.
For an overcoat lining? really? Most suits and coats are lined with a bemberg or viscose type of material. It's just functionally better than other natural fiber options. Even top bespoke tailors will use bemberg.

This is a strange and surprising conversation. And now I'm curious @Balman and @sussi : what lining do you typically have in your overcoats?
 

zissou

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
9,392
Reaction score
8,940
For an overcoat lining? really? Most suits and coats are lined with a bemberg or viscose type of material. It's just functionally better than other natural fiber options. Even top bespoke tailors will use bemberg.

This is a strange and surprising conversation. And now I'm curious @Balman and @sussi : what lining do you typically have in your overcoats?
Bemberg, viscose, rayon, etc., are technically manufactured fibers made from natural wood cellulose, rather than synthetic fibers made from plastic or petroleum. Viscose tends to be much more breathable than polyester while still having that silky hand.
 

gdl203

Purveyor of the Secret Sauce
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
45,648
Reaction score
54,523
Oh is this the distinction we're discussing here? Synthetics from natural fibers vs petro synthetic? I've been very confused by this whole discussion - I'm not really following it.
 

zissou

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
9,392
Reaction score
8,940
I think it's probably an issue of semantics. In the fabric world, fabrics are usually natural (made from fibers in their natural state), manufactured (natural materials that have been heavily processed to change their form), or synthetic (made from synthetic materials).

wool/cotton/silk/linen = natural
bemberg/viscose/tencel/rayon = manufactured
polyester/nylon = synthetic

As long as the process doesn't use nasty chemicals, manufactured fibers like tencel are high-performing and sustainable, being made from waste wood cellulose.
 

gdl203

Purveyor of the Secret Sauce
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
45,648
Reaction score
54,523
I see no reason why makers would ever omit a material specification, like in this case for lining, if they didn't believe it will be received negatively by the consumer.
Some details are just omitted because they don't seem that useful - I think this is the reason you're looking for, nothing more nefarious than that. Do all makes give you the composition of the thread used to sew the garment? Of the interlining in the collar? What about footwear? So much of the construction materials and details are omitted, to avoid saturating the user with info they typically don't need or want.

The amount of information is a continuum from very little/not enough to a lot/too much, and I think everyone tries to strike a balance that provides enough info without getting into stuff that is not useful.

Most garments have composition of lining on the fabric tag and sometimes that information is relayed online as a bullet point or something like that. We don't always put everything on the product page.

In any case, the navy Valstar overcoat's lining is 100% viscose.
 

gdl203

Purveyor of the Secret Sauce
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
45,648
Reaction score
54,523
So this Doppiaa chore coat I recently received (beautiful piece imho) would be considered of questionable quality because it is a 90/10 blend of wool and polyamide?
I'm not sure if the question is in jest or serious but if you're asking seriously, of course not. When designing fabrics, it sometimes makes a lot of sense to add nylon/polyamide to a yarn to make it work better for this specific use, in a specific weave. It makes it stronger without adding weight, sometimes help a more open/basketweave weave hold up better with wear and the elements, or can help add stretch and make a cloth more comfortable. The idea that wool mixes are questionable quality is kinda "level 2" of menswear learning IMO in a 10 level game. Once one understands what specific blending can achieve, one gets a better understanding of why it is sometimes a good approach.

Same goes with knitwear, some synthetic (or manufactured) materials will bring something totally different to the knit (more hairy, or a specific softness, or a crunchiness) that can't really be achieved with only natural fibers. It's a design (fabric design) choice to achieve a specific look and feel.

you can try to make a 60/40 fabric with only natural materials, but it won't be the same. It won't feel and look like 60/40.

and then there's the environmentalist dimension, which is of course a personal choice. But even natural fibers like cotton can have a very water-intensive production chain and be hard on the environment. If someone prefers natural fibers only as some sort of ethical choice, that's fine with me. But the shortcuts that say adding a synthetic component to fabric design lessens the quality of the garment, is a lazy argument IMO.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
16
Reaction score
17
I'm not sure if the question is in jest or serious but if you're asking seriously, of course not. When designing fabrics, it sometimes makes a lot of sense to add nylon/polyamide to a yarn to make it work better for this specific use, in a specific weave. It makes it stronger without adding weight, sometimes help a more open/basketweave weave hold up better with wear and the elements. The idea that wool mixes are questionable quality is kinda "level 2" of menswear learning IMO in a 10 level game. Once one understands what specific blending can achieve, one gets a better understanding of why it is sometimes a good approach.

Same goes with knitwear, some synthetic (or manufactured) materials will bring something totally different to the knit (more hairy, or a specific softness, or a crunchiness) that can't really be achieved with only natural fibers. It's a design (fabric design) choice to achieve a specific look and feel.

you can try to make a 60/40 fabric with only natural materials, but it won't be the same. It won't feel and look like 60/40.
It was said in jest. I previously mentioned how synthetics are used for structural purposes. Personally, I like it when makers experiment with fabric and some of my favorite pieces are blends. I am still learning a lot about fashion and would not even consider myself a journeyman but I can tell right off the bat that the coat is of "chef's kiss" quality.
 

Featured Sponsor

Do You Have a Signature Fragrance?

  • Yes, I have a signature fragrance I wear every day

  • Yes, I have a signature fragrance but I don't wear it daily

  • No, I have several fragrances and rotate through them

  • I don't wear fragrance


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
509,225
Messages
10,608,783
Members
224,875
Latest member
GentWithoutaCent
Top