We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Maybe I'm having math problems but I get 8.4 hours is everyone takes 90 seconds.Originally Posted by Baron
Have we set a date already for that?Originally Posted by Buster
This roster breakdown is cool but can you ditch the second catcher? I don't see any upside in getting deep into that position since it barely has any talent through 12 anyway. Also the idea of a DH-only UTIL is a little bizarre - any batter should be eligible there.Originally Posted by gehrig
I am officially vehemently against this idea. The league is overly-complicated enough as it is. To the point where keeping up with it will probably rapidly become tiresome for me as it is. The defensive demands of the OF do not matter in our league at all. We are not doing defensive scoring. If you want to manage a "real" baseball team Bill, I'm sure you could just go buy one.Anyone interested in making three of the OF positions LF CF and RF? It would be more true-to-life as the defensive demands of each outfield position vary greatly.
YES... See you already are unprepared!Originally Posted by Tokyo Slim
I have only one simple request...lets have 23 rosters spots but 9 actual hitting starters.Originally Posted by whnay.
Instead of 2 c, 5 OF and such you just have bench spots. Starters: C 1B 2B 3B SS OF OF OF Util SP SP SP CP CP P POriginally Posted by whnay.
ok... two decisions on the table: