I do not understand women's shoes

[Flambeur]

Originally Posted by Rambo

There was a study of woman's orgasms and they found that over 30% of them couldn't get topped off because their feet were cold. Once they put on socks the problem was solved.

i wanna see that study LOL

But no socks. I'd leave and find a ***** who can orgasm without

 

[Rambo]

Originally Posted by Flambeur

i wanna see that study LOL But no socks. I'd leave and find a ***** who can orgasm without
Compromise, let them keep Uggs on instead of high heels.

 

[Rambo]

Originally Posted by Flambeur

i wanna see that study LOL But no socks. I'd leave and find a ***** who can orgasm without
Found it: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4111360.stm

When they gave the couples socks to wear, about 80% of the couples were able to achieve orgasm compared with 50% previously in this staged environment.

 

[Go Surface]

How could you NOT understand these?

 

[celery]

Damn crab people, always taking up the runway space.

 

[HORNS]

My wife can walk around all day in a pair of the higher end shoes mentioned above, but she can not in the Aldo shoes she thought were cute when she bought them.

Really, at the end of it all, it boils down to design aesthetics and then quality. Sure, they're not built like brick **** houses like men's shoes, but the quality of the leather, fabrics, and gemstones are high.

BTW my wife gets her Louboutins Topy'd with a red material and it looks perfect.

 

[whiteslashasian]

Originally Posted by celery

Damn crab people, always taking up the runway space.
They kind of look like hooves to me. Either way this is a good crossover into that Beastiality threak...

Originally Posted by HORNS

BTW my wife gets her Louboutins Topy'd with a red material and it looks perfect.
I've seen those actually; seems like a good way to protect some very expensive heels.

 

[SkinnyGoomba]

thats a good idea.

I believe the more expensive brands usually have better looking styles. I like kate spade, they arent killer expensive.

 

[eztantz]

Originally Posted by GoSurface

How could you NOT understand these?

WTF?

 

[Roikins]

Originally Posted by Flambeur

I don't know, dude, I can tell a $50 shoe from a $350 shoe from like 10 feet away. Very few cheap shoes "flow" and "look" right once your eyes are good at distinguishing crap. Just like a crappy suit.

I meant apart from design and look, and discounting reallllly cheap ones that look like plastic or hooker/stripper shoes. The middle of the road ones that "borrow" the sleeker or better designs and looks of expensive shoes tend to show in the details I mentioned.

 

[Flambeur]

Originally Posted by Roikins

I meant apart from design and look, and discounting reallllly cheap ones that look like plastic or hooker/stripper shoes. The middle of the road ones that "borrow" the sleeker or better designs and looks of expensive shoes tend to show in the details I mentioned.

Very few, dude.

I was with my ex at a shoe store a couple weeks ago that sells $50-250 shoes and most just looked like crap.

Plus I think it's fine to pay for an original design/quality/details/etc, just like when it comes to my ****.