STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Different lasts are different. The 890 will have more room across the vamp than the 82. Overall, the 82 is narrower than the 890.
But beware of comparing shoes in one last to boots in another. Boot lasts run wider than shoe lasts of the same type. Thus, a boot on the 82 will have a shade more room than a shoe on the 82. YMMV.
Did not know that...thanks!
Yes, my Galway definitely fit different than my other 82 Last shoes.
Yes, I think EG staffs have a tendency to advise for a snug fit
Could someone compare and contrast the fit of 888 vs 82 for me please, particularly around the forefoot and toe area.
I have an MTO order on hold at the moment because I'm worried that the 6.5D that I used for my last order might have too much space and am considering amending the size to 6.5C. I'm a bit nervous about doing this and unfortunately EG don't have any stock 888 shoes in 6.5C to try on but I did go into the store to try what I think was the closest I could find, a Chelsea on 82 in 6.5C. I'd like to understand whether an 888 in the same size and width is likely to be more restrictive, less restrictive or about the same around the toe area and joint area compared to the 82 that I tried on.
From looking at them visually in the shop the 82 seems to narrow slightly more sharply towards the front than the 888 does so my guess is that the 888 might have slightly more toe space or maybe the same but probably not less than the 82 that I tried on but I'm guessing that there are a few people here who have shoes on both the 82 and 888 lasts so could probably give me some really good feedback.
- Julian
Your inquiry highlights the importance of trying on shoes whenever possible. Good job trying on the closest thing to what you want that EG had available. What did EG advise on width fitting for an 888 compared to the 82? Their advice would be valuable. You can always call/email their sales department directly for more info. How did the 82 last in C width feel?
The 888 and 82 (and even 890) are in the same last family and are slightly different variations on a theme--an aggressively chiseled/tapered/shapely toe. Overall, the 888 and 82 are quite similar in fit. In my experience (yes I have multiple pairs on 888 and 82), there is less room in the chiseled toe and vamp of the 888 than the 82, but this is directly influenced by individual foot shape, width at ball, and instep. In general, I think you risk having less (possibly not enough) room for your pinky toe by choosing a narrower width fitting on the 888. Why do you think a D-width 888 will have too much space?
I think the fellow who writes the Permanent Style blog wrote a piece on EG lasts and experimenting in width and lengths. It's worth tracking down because he mentions the problem of the crease and captoe cutting into his foot. Best of luck. Cheers.