chromexcel?

kraftar · Jul 9, 2010

What is the difference among shoes made from chromexcel vs regular calf or cordovan? I understand that the chromexcel process is more involved than for regular calf but how does that translate into the appearance and/or durability of the final product?

patrickBOOTH · Jul 9, 2010

Chromexcel is specific to Horween. It is calf leather, but it is chrome tanned first then vegetable retanned (like cordovan). It creates a very durable, beautiful pull-up leather due to the vegetable retanning. Vegetable tanning also is more resistant to bacteria, and fungus and creates a more durable process, whereas chrome tanning creates a much more flexible, and stretchy kind of leather. Chromexcel you get the best of both worlds. All of the oils used in the vegetable retanning process for chromexcel is what creates the pull-up effect.

kraftar · Jul 9, 2010

Thanks patrick! What do you mean by "pull-up" leather and the "pull-up" effect? Also, is the texture more like cordovan (kind of waxy) or regular calf?

DWFII · Jul 9, 2010

The thing is...and make no mistake I think it is a fine leather...is that chromexel is an "oil stuffed" leather. What does that mean? Abandon all hope of a high shine...or even more than a gleam.

emptym · Jul 9, 2010

What are your thoughts on "cavalier" chromexcel, DW? Have you handled any? The pics on Horween's blog make it look a lot like shell cordovan, not really shiny but pretty glossy. Nick also mentions in the Q&A on that page that cavalier chromexel is not as shiny as shell.

DWFII · Jul 9, 2010

Originally Posted by emptym

What are your thoughts on "cavalier" chromexcel, DW? Have you handled any? The pics on Horween's blog make it look a lot like shell cordovan, not really shiny but pretty glossy. Nick also mentions in the Q&A on that page that cavalier chromexel is not as shiny as shell.
It's a nice enough looking leather but it is better suited to "casual" shoes, IMO. Also just a little...but significant...correction to Patrick's post. Chromexel is not calf, it is cow. Calf is the superior leather--the younger the animal the tighter and denser the fiber mat. And the corium (the grain surface) will be tighter and cleaner as well.

daruma · Jul 9, 2010

when it comes to shoes, is there a situation where cowhide is better than calfskin? maybe more durable? can people easily distinguish the difference between cowhide and calfskin?

emptym · Jul 9, 2010

Originally Posted by DWFII

It's a nice enough looking leather but it is better suited to "casual" shoes, IMO.

Also just a little...but significant...correction to Patrick's post. Chromexel is not calf, it is cow. Calf is the superior leather--the younger the animal the tighter and denser the fiber mat. And the corium (the grain surface) will be tighter and cleaner as well.
Interesting. Thank you.

DWFII · Jul 10, 2010

Originally Posted by daruma

when it comes to shoes, is there a situation where cowhide is better than calfskin? maybe more durable? can people easily distinguish the difference between cowhide and calfskin?
What is "durable?" What is "better?" Cowhide can be, usually is, thicker than calf. Is that more durable? In some situations, such as when a person is wearing the shoe in a hostile environment and every day, thicker might be better. Cow would also be cheaper. Is that better? Ounce for ounce the younger animal is always the superior leather due to density and closeness of the fibers. But then kangaroo, regardless of age is one of the toughest leathers known to man--ounce for ounce the most tear resistant, and it is usually pretty thin compared to cow or even calf. As a general rule the denser the leather, the longer it will resist cracking and the better it will resist tearing or puncture. Can people tell the difference? Sometimes. Some people. It depends a lot on how the leather is finished. Except for the weight (thickness), I doubt anyone except an expert could tell the difference between calf or cow if both were finished as chromexel.

kraftar · Jul 12, 2010

That helps alot... thanks for the information.

razl · Jul 12, 2010

Originally Posted by DWFII

Ounce for ounce the younger animal is always the superior leather due to density and closeness of the fibers. But then kangaroo, regardless of age is one of the toughest leathers known to man--ounce for ounce the most tear resistant, and it is usually pretty thin compared to cow or even calf.

So why don't we (or at least I) see leather goods, especially shoes, from kangaroos? Is it that it doesn't finish/present as well? I'm just curious.

DWFII · Jul 12, 2010

Originally Posted by razl

So why don't we (or at least I) see leather goods, especially shoes, from kangaroos? Is it that it doesn't finish/present as well? I'm just curious.
I don't know. I think it has more to do with public perception than anything else. For instance (and this may have changed in recent years) kangaroo was on the banned list in California for some time despite the "environmental impact" statements presented by the government of Australia certifying that 'roos were nearly a pest animal. For the layman, kangaroo is nearly indistinguishable from a fine grade of calf skin. It would, however, probably be at least a half ounce or even a full ounce thinner than the calf. That said kangaroo is used in more leather goods than you might think. Some years back Wolverine(?) boot company was manufacturing a work boot that used kangaroo. Some athletic shoes use roo. And roo is very popular in Western (cowboy) bootmaking. All that said, cutting economies are perhaps not as good with roo. It is expensive because it is not ordinarily farmed, and it can be heavily scarred because 'roos fight for dominance.

LynahFaithful · Jul 12, 2010

DW - Thanks for your insights on Chromexel. I have a pair on order and it is nice to know now, before I get them, that I won't be spending future hours trying get a high shine on them.

razl · Jul 12, 2010

Originally Posted by DWFII

I don't know. I think it has more to do with public perception than anything else. ...

Thanks much for taking the time to share - I wouldn't have known what to think if I came across a 'roo piece, now I've got some idea!

DoTheGrownup · Jul 12, 2010

Originally Posted by razl

So why don't we (or at least I) see leather goods, especially shoes, from kangaroos? Is it that it doesn't finish/present as well? I'm just curious.

FWIW, many high end football (soccer) boots use kangaroo leather. Before the advent of synthetics, it was usually considered the best leather for soccer shoes because it is supple, durable, and relatively water resistant.

The Adidas Copa Mundial, maybe the most iconic football boot ever, is made of kangaroo leather, as are many high end leather boots from Nike, Puma, Diadora, etc.

chromexcel?

Senior Member

Stylish Dinosaur

Senior Member

Bespoke Boot and Shoemaker

Moderator

Bespoke Boot and Shoemaker

Senior Member

Moderator

Bespoke Boot and Shoemaker

Senior Member

Stylish Dinosaur

Bespoke Boot and Shoemaker

Senior Member

Stylish Dinosaur

Senior Member

Classic Menswear Featured products

Similar threads

Featured Sponsor

It’s a mark of quality and craftsmanship

I like it when it’s subtle

I don’t like visible stitching

Doesn’t matter to me

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

FOLLOW STYLEFORUM ON: