The WAYWT Discussion Thread

[Woodyear]

Originally Posted by Lane

Its my way of showing whats on the inside. Its like any other style here where people aspire to something. I'm communicating my inner me through this style, and I really could care less about how its perceived as "effemminate" to you. Lots of people dress in certain ways on here where they try to capture their personality because its simply to evoke something to others.

I agree wholeheartedly. My point is "whats on the inside" in your case is obviously a woman, whether you know it or are willing to admit it or not. Your "inner me" is not masculine or you wouldnt be cross dressing, I think that much is obvious.

 

[hendrix]

be banished already you terrible troll

 

[NorCal]

Originally Posted by AlphaAndTheOmega

or

^Which do you prefer?



The 2nd

 

[eseanyang]

New WAYWT poster, its not much, but about as well as i can do with a uni budget. Any criticisms and comments are welcome. Hopefully i won't get too flamed haha. Sorry for the blurry pic, taken with my comp camera. Flathead shirt Sterlingwear classic peacoat Iron Heart 634s Red Wing GT

 

[impolyt_one]

Stanley VanBuren, do you want me to swag you out?

 

[ataru]

CrazyJew, wearing non-prescription glasses is one of those things that most guys would be embarrassed to do. Even if someone thinks they could pull off glasses like James Dean or Buddy Holly, something about wearing unnecessary glasses just seems too narcissistic. It's the same kind of thing as wearing sunglasses when it isn't bright, although not as obvious to the people around you (since no one knows whether you have good eyesight or not)

I don't mean to insult anyone here that may do it... but I wouldn't do it myself. I feel like the privilege of the option of wearing good looking glasses is a sort of consolation prize for people not blessed with naturally good eyesight.

 

[Woodyear]

Originally Posted by APK

I didn't misunderstand it. That post from the ToJ thread had you wagging your finger at people who think a guy is gay or girly for caring about how he looks or clothing. I got that. I quoted that to show the irony of your later post here where you claim Uncontrol wants to be a woman (i.e. is girly) strictly based on how he dresses. Do you really not see the contradictions in your statements? You wagged your finger at people for doing something and then did it yourself.
Theres a distinct and fundamental difference here which is in plain sight. Assuming someone is effeminate because theyre on a style forum is a ridiculous, idiotic assertion grounded in a skewed and unrealistic, unculutured, homophobic world view. Seeing a man who is clearly dressed as a woman, and who purposely makes themselves appear as feminine as possible, it is only natural to assume that on some level that person wants to be something they clearly arent; namely female. It is inherent to Lane's and to a lesser extent, to Uncontrols style of dress that they admire womens clothing to the point of wearing it (or wearing "mens" clothing styled after womens clothing, in order to cater to other cross dressers who may not be able to fit into the womens clothing which they so obviously desire). If i dressed as a ******* airline pilot every day, yet i was not an airline pilot, would it be a rational conclusion that I desire to look like an airline pilot? The answer is unquestionably in the affirmative. Now if a man desires to look like a female (as we have established that one who dresses up as something on a continuous basis desires to look like that which they have dressed up as) isnt that synonymous with saying he wants to be a female? For what reason would one want to look like a woman, but not be one? Barring the obvious reason that they are simply too ashamed to admit that they desperately want to be female on some unconscious (or conscious) level, there are no consistent rational reasons one could infer besides maybe saying "**** you" to societies gender roles i.e. Marilyn Manson. I think its clear that Lane is definetly not doing that, and i highly doubt Uncontrol is either.

 

[aeglus]

Originally Posted by impolyt_one

Stanley VanBuren, do you want me to swag you out?

svb resist the urge... before you know it your wallet will be empty and you'll have 5 leather jackets

also here's a quick fit; probably not going to work at this place again since I don't really want to work on Fridays or wake up early

 

[eseanyang]

aeglus, i must say, i really love all your outfits. The fits are all really spot on and the pieces nice.

 

[noob in 89]

lol @ general SF 'aspirational' hypocrisy as far as prep vs. ****** goes.

Also, someone get woody a Judith Butler IV, stat!

 

[Makeshift_Robot]

Woodyear did you ever know any actual transvestites, ever?

 

[DLester]

Originally Posted by Woodyear

werds*werds*werds*no paragraphs*moar werds

stop

 

[jjwwa]

how to post picture?

 

[Woodyear]

Originally Posted by Makeshift_Robot

Woodyear did you ever know any actual transvestites, ever?

Have i been close friends with a transexual? No, not because i have any problem with them, i think my whole point here is that I sympathize deeply for them. Its just not every day you meet a ****** that you have enough in common with to become pals with. Makeshift robot, have you ever known any actual albino jews?

 

[Eason]

Originally Posted by jjww又一年

how to post picture?

行了，你是不是在那个北京的星巴克？